Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2025
Same author

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A study of radiation workers: Dosimetry, chromosomal aberrations, and cancer risk.

Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis·2025
Same author

Assessment of the predictive power the radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis method in prostate cancer patients.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Disparity of turbinal bones in placental mammals.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2024
Same author

Neck Node Squamous Cell Metastasis from Unknown Primary and Mutagen Sensitivity: A Case Series.

Case reports in oncology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Estimating the confidence of statistical model based shape prediction.

Rémi Blanc1, Ekaterina Syrkina, Gábor Székely

  • 1Computer Vision Laboratory, ETHZ, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland. blanc@vision.ee.ethz.ch

Information Processing in Medical Imaging : Proceedings of the ... Conference
|August 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method to estimate confidence regions for shape predictions from partial data using statistical shape models. This approach uses bootstrap resampling to assess prediction errors and validate region accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Computer vision
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Accurate shape prediction from limited data is crucial in many fields.
  • Existing methods often lack robust confidence estimation for predicted shapes.
  • Statistical shape models provide a framework for shape analysis and prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for estimating confidence regions around predicted shapes.
  • To provide a quantitative measure of uncertainty in shape predictions derived from partial observations.
  • To develop a validation strategy for the proposed confidence regions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a statistical shape model for shape prediction from partial observations.
  • Estimating the distribution of prediction error non-parametrically via bootstrap resampling.
  • Deriving individual confidence regions for each landmark assuming a Gaussian distribution.
  • Merging landmark confidence regions to establish overall region probability.
  • Validating region accuracy using a separate test set.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively estimates confidence regions for shape predictions.
  • Bootstrap resampling provides a robust estimation of prediction error distribution.
  • The method demonstrates adaptability to various shape prediction algorithms.
  • Validation confirms the accuracy of the derived confidence regions.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method offers a reliable way to quantify uncertainty in shape predictions.
  • This approach enhances the interpretability and trustworthiness of shape analysis from incomplete data.
  • The technique is versatile and can be integrated with existing shape prediction frameworks.