Related Experiment Videos
A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left
Hursh Naik1, Anthony J White, Tarun Chakravarty
1Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) show similar outcomes for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis regarding mortality and major adverse events. However, PCI increases the need for target vessel revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis.
- PCI is not recommended by major cardiology guidelines for ULMCA stenosis (Class III recommendation).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of PCI versus CABG for treating ULMCA stenosis.
- To synthesize existing evidence on clinical outcomes, including mortality and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE).
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of ten clinical studies involving 3,773 patients treated with PCI or CABG for ULMCA stenosis.
- Outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target vessel revascularization were compared up to 3 years post-procedure.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in MACCE or mortality was observed between PCI and CABG groups at 1, 2, and 3 years.
- PCI was associated with a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization compared to CABG at all time points.
- Mortality rates were comparable between the two treatment groups up to 3 years.
Conclusions:
- PCI is a viable alternative to CABG for selected patients with ULMCA stenosis, demonstrating similar safety and efficacy in terms of mortality and MACCE.
- The increased need for target vessel revascularization with PCI necessitates careful patient selection and consideration of long-term management strategies.
Objectives:
This study sought to understand the total weight of evidence regarding outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis.
Background:
Following a diagnosis of significant ULMCA stenosis in an individual that is a candidate for surgery, CABG is recommended by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, whereas PCI is not recommended (Class III).
Methods:
Databases were searched for clinical studies that reported outcomes after PCI and CABG for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis. Ten studies were identified that included a total of 3,773 patients.
Results:
Meta-analysis showed that death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events) were similar in the PCI- and CABG-treated patients at 1 year (odds ratio [OR]: 0.84 [95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.22]), 2 years (OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 0.81 to 1.94]), and 3 years (OR: 1.16 [95% CI: 0.68 to 1.98]). Target vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group at 1 year (OR: 4.36 [95% CI: 2.60 to 7.32]), 2 years (OR: 4.20 [95% CI: 2.21 to 7.97]), and 3 years (OR: 3.30 [95% CI: 0.96 to 11.33]). There was no difference in mortality in PCI- versus CABG-treated patients at 1 year (OR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.70 to 1.41]), 2 years (OR: 1.27 [95% CI: 0.83 to 1.94]), and 3 years (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.66 to 1.86]).
Conclusions:
Our analysis reveals no difference in mortality or major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, for up to 3 years, between PCI and CABG for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis. However, PCI patients had a significantly higher risk of target vessel revascularization. In selected patients with ULMCA stenosis, PCI is emerging as an acceptable option.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care