Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
EDTA: Conditional Formation Constant01:09

EDTA: Conditional Formation Constant

Each EDTA molecule has six binding sites: four carboxyl groups and two amino groups. The fully protonated form of EDTA is represented as H6Y2+. However, it can exist in different forms, H5Y+, H4Y, H3Y−, H2Y2−, and HY3−, depending on the pH of the solution. In very basic solutions with pH > 10.17, the fully deprotonated form, Y4−, is the predominant species that readily complexes with metal ions in a 1:1 ratio.
For the equilibrium reaction of the metal with the Y4− form of EDTA, the formation...
Conditions of Equilibrium01:28

Conditions of Equilibrium

Equilibrium refers to a state where a rigid body is not subjected to any translational or rotational motion. This state is achieved when the force and couple acting on a rigid body equal zero. When the system of external forces results in a net effect equivalent to zero, the rigid body is considered to be in equilibrium.
Internal forces are not considered for conditions of equilibrium because they occur in equal and opposite pairs within the body, effectively canceling each other. As a result,...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaginative Thought.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Exploring the role of home play and learning activities in socioemotional development at 36-months: Findings from a large birth cohort study.

Infant behavior & development·2024
Same author

Streets ahead: Neighborhood safety and active outdoor play in early childhood using a nationally representative sample of 5-year-olds.

Child development·2024
Same author

Introduction to Progress and Puzzles of Cognitive Science: Introduction to a Wiley Virtual Issue.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

How people think about the truth of hypothetical impossibilities.

Memory & cognition·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Indicative and counterfactual 'only if' conditionals.

Suzanne M Egan1, Juan A García-Madruga, Ruth M J Byrne

  • 1Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, South Circular Road, Limerick, Ireland. suzanne.egan@mic.ul.ie

Acta Psychologica
|August 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Reasoners consider fewer possibilities for "if A then B" conditionals than for "A only if B" conditionals. This difference extends to counterfactuals, impacting how people understand and infer from conditional statements.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Understanding conditional statements is fundamental to human reasoning.
  • The linguistic forms 'if A then B' and 'A only if B' can be interpreted differently, impacting logical inferences.
  • Counterfactual conditionals, expressing hypothetical scenarios, add complexity to conditional reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct possibilities reasoners consider when interpreting 'if A then B' versus 'A only if B' conditionals.
  • To examine how these interpretations differ between indicative and counterfactual conditional moods.
  • To explore the implications for theories of counterfactual reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to assess reasoners' judgments of consistent event conjunctions.
  • Participants evaluated possibilities for indicative and counterfactual conditionals of the 'if' and 'only if' forms.
  • Inferences drawn from different conditional types were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Reasoners consider one possibility for indicative 'if' conditionals but two for indicative 'only if' conditionals.
  • Two possibilities are considered for both indicative and counterfactual 'if' and 'only if' conditionals.
  • Temporal ordering of possibilities differs between 'if' and 'only if' interpretations, influencing inferences.

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation of 'only if' involves a distinct set of possibilities compared to 'if', affecting reasoning.
  • Counterfactual conditionals engage similar reasoning processes to indicative conditionals in terms of the number of possibilities considered.
  • Findings necessitate refined theories of counterfactual conditional understanding and inference.