Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Butorphanol Pharmacokinetics Across Species: Meta-Analysis Integrating Allometric Scaling and Minimal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2026
Same author

Single-treatment in situ photo-vaccination with paclitaxel prodrug-PDT enables durable local and abscopal tumor control in a bilateral Colon 26 model.

Photochemistry and photobiology·2026
Same author

Meta-Analysis and Physiologically-Based Modeling of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexamethasone in Horses.

Pharmaceutical research·2026
Same author

Physiologically based pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone in rats featuring nonlinear tissue binding.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals·2026
Same author

Quantitative Modeling of Lipid Droplet Contribution to Intracellular Drug Distribution and Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Efficacy and safety of cemdisiran siRNA in myasthenia gravis (NIMBLE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Methods of utilizing baseline values for indirect response models.

Sukyung Woo1, Dipti Pawaskar, William J Jusko

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.

Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
|August 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Modified Indirect Response Models (IDR) equations are essential for accurately analyzing normalized pharmacodynamic data. Proper handling of baseline values improves model precision and reduces bias, especially with rich datasets.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • Indirect Response Models (IDR) are widely used in pharmacodynamics.
  • Normalization of data to baseline values (R(0)) is crucial for accurate analysis.
  • Existing IDR models may require adjustments for effective baseline normalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and assess modified IDR equations for normalizing data to baseline values.
  • To evaluate different methods for utilizing baseline information in IDR models.
  • To compare the performance of modified vs. original IDR equations and baseline handling techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Modified pharmacodynamic response equations (ratio, change, percent change from baseline) were developed for four basic IDR models.
  • Original and modified equations were fitted to simulated data.
  • Baseline handling methods investigated: estimation (E), fixing at start (F1), fixing at average of start/return (F2).

Main Results:

  • Modified equations successfully recovered true parameter values, unlike the simple observed/baseline ratio method.
  • Increased data variability led to higher bias and imprecision, particularly for the F1 method.
  • Method F2 performed comparably to E and better than F1; E showed no significant advantage over F1 with limited return-to-baseline data.

Conclusions:

  • Modifications to IDR equations are necessary for direct assessment of baseline-normalized data.
  • Proper handling of baseline responses is critical for accurate pharmacodynamic modeling.
  • Method E is generally preferred for its lower bias and better precision; F2 is suitable for rich datasets.