Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

05:30
Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
Published on: October 31, 2025
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal-cell carcinomas
Ryohei Hattori1, Kamihira Osamu, Yasushi Yoshino
1Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. rhattori@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Journal of Endourology
|August 25, 2009
Summary
Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a viable option for large renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), showing comparable long-term cancer control to open surgery despite increased intraoperative complications.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Radical nephrectomy is a standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- Laparoscopic surgery offers potential benefits over open procedures, but its efficacy for large RCCs (>7 cm) requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes and long-term cancer control of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy for localized large RCCs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 131 patients with RCCs >7 cm undergoing radical nephrectomy (1996-2008).
- 52 patients in the laparoscopy group and 79 in the open group.
- Exclusion of patients with metastasis, pT4 disease, or IVC tumor thrombus. Median follow-up: 41 months (laparoscopy) and 51 months (open).
Main Results:
- Laparoscopic group had smaller tumors (88 vs 89 mm) and significantly less blood loss (245 vs 663 mL, p < 0.01).
- Intraoperative complications were more frequent in the laparoscopy group (15% vs 2.5%).
- 5- and 10-year disease-free and patient-survival rates were comparable between groups.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic nephrectomy is feasible for localized large RCC, with similar oncological outcomes to open surgery.
- Higher intraoperative complication rates in laparoscopy require careful consideration.
- Laparoscopic nephrectomy can be an alternative to open surgery for localized large RCC, pending longer follow-up to confirm oncological efficacy.
