Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
05:06
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass.
Javier F Magrina1, Mercedes Espada, Raquel Munoz
1From the Department of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; and Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
|August 25, 2009
Summary
Robotic adnexectomy offers similar patient outcomes to laparoscopy, including blood loss and complication rates. However, robotic surgery requires a longer operating time by 12 minutes.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Technology
- Gynecologic Oncology
Background:
- Adnexectomy is a common gynecologic procedure.
- Advancements in surgical technology offer new approaches.
- Robotic surgery is increasingly adopted in various surgical fields.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the patient outcomes of robotic-assisted adnexectomy versus traditional laparoscopic adnexectomy.
- To evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of robotic technology in adnexectomy procedures.
Main Methods:
- Comparative study of 85 patients undergoing robotic adnexectomy and 91 patients undergoing laparoscopic adnexectomy.
- Analysis of patient demographics, surgical factors, and operative outcomes.
- Statistical comparison using univariate, multivariate analysis, and Fisher exact test.
Main Results:
- Robotic surgery included a higher proportion of obese and higher anesthetic risk patients.
- Mean operative time was 12 minutes longer for robotic adnexectomy (P=.01).
- Blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rates were comparable between robotic and laparoscopic groups.
Conclusions:
- Both laparoscopy and robotics yield similar outcomes for adnexectomy.
- Robotic adnexectomy demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy to laparoscopy.
- A longer operative time is associated with robotic adnexectomy.
