Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Adherens Junctions01:24

Adherens Junctions

Strong contact points between adjacent cells anchor them to each other, forming tissues. Such anchoring junctions are of two types –  adherens junctions and desmosomes. Adherens junctions are abundant in tissues such as  epithelium and endothelium, forming a continuous zone of adhesion called the adhesion belt. In other tissues, such as  heart muscle, they appear as clusters, linking the cells to produce coordinated heart muscle contraction.
Adherens Junctions are Dynamic
The endothelial cells...
Adhesion01:14

Adhesion

Adhesion occurs when one type of molecule is attracted to a different molecule. Water exhibits adhesive properties in the presence of polar surfaces, such as glass or cellulose in plants. For instance, when water is poured into a glass, the positively charged hydrogen molecules of water are more attracted to the negatively charged oxygen molecules in the silica than to the oxygen in neighboring water molecules.
Capillary action is a result of water’s adhesive tendencies. When a narrow glass...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methodology and quality assurance practices in performing anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) analysis: an EFLM report on an international survey.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Stored L-PRF membranes: safety, morphology, tensile properties, and cell viability-an in vitro pilot study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Results of red cell antibody screening assays from 2,500 laboratories in 10 external quality assessment programs: sensitivity for anti-D.

Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue·2026
Same author

Lupus anticoagulant testing in Belgian laboratories: a comparison with the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) guidelines.

Acta clinica Belgica·2025
Same author

Peri-implantitis Risk Assessment (PiRA) Part 1: Umbrella Review of a Multifactorial Disease with Many Risk Factors.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025
Same author

Peri-implantitis Risk Assessment (PiRA) Part 2: Retrospective Study and Framework for an Evidence-Based Prediction Model for Clinicians.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

In Vitro Assay of Bacterial Adhesion onto Mammalian Epithelial Cells
05:57

In Vitro Assay of Bacterial Adhesion onto Mammalian Epithelial Cells

Published on: May 16, 2011

Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro.

Jan van Gastel1, Marc Quirynen, Wim Teughels

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium. Johannes.vanGastel@med.KULeuven.ac.be

The Angle Orthodontist
|August 27, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Orthodontic bracket materials significantly impact biofilm formation and bacterial adhesion. Certain bracket types retain more plaque, potentially affecting oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment.

More Related Videos

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

Automated, High-Throughput Detection of Bacterial Adherence to Host Cells
07:21

Automated, High-Throughput Detection of Bacterial Adherence to Host Cells

Published on: September 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

In Vitro Assay of Bacterial Adhesion onto Mammalian Epithelial Cells
05:57

In Vitro Assay of Bacterial Adhesion onto Mammalian Epithelial Cells

Published on: May 16, 2011

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

Automated, High-Throughput Detection of Bacterial Adherence to Host Cells
07:21

Automated, High-Throughput Detection of Bacterial Adherence to Host Cells

Published on: September 17, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Oral microbiology
  • Biomaterials science
  • Orthodontic technology

Background:

  • Orthodontic brackets are prone to bacterial colonization and biofilm formation.
  • The material and design of orthodontic brackets may influence microbial adhesion and retention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in total bacterial counts and biofilm formation capacity among seven distinct orthodontic bracket types.
  • To evaluate the in vitro adherence of oral bacteria to various commercially available bracket systems.

Main Methods:

  • An in vitro experiment compared seven bracket systems (Damon, Clarity, Mystique, Speed, Victory MBT, Micro-loc, Generus).
  • Premolar brackets were incubated in bacterial-laden medium for 72 hours.
  • Bacterial counts (CFU), CFU ratio (aerobe/anaerobe), and black pigmented bacteria were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in biofilm formation were observed across bracket types.
  • Brackets were categorized into low (E, F, G), intermediate (D), and high (A, B, C) plaque-retaining groups.
  • High adhesion groups (A, B, C) showed significantly lower aerobe/anaerobe CFU ratios (P < .05).

Conclusions:

  • The hypothesis that bracket type influences bacterial counts and biofilm formation is supported.
  • Orthodontic brackets act as distinct sites for biofilm development.
  • Material differences among bracket types lead to varied microbial adhesion.