Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vision01:24

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at the...
Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative evaluation of the sedative efficacy of oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg vs. 0.75 mg/kg) with papoose board restraint for managing severe dental anxiety in paediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC anesthesiology·2026
Same author

De novo fast motion computation in the primate visual cortex.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Conformal and adhesive gel for stable electrophysiology on hairy animals without shaving.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Localized Nonablative Neuromodulatory Irradiation of the Nucleus Accumbens Ameliorates Voluntary Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Miniature Pigs.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2025
Same author

Cortical direction selectivity increases from the input to the output layers of visual cortex.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Neuronal representation of visual working memory content in the primate primary visual cortex.

Science advances·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Large Lateral Craniotomy Procedure for Mesoscale Wide-field Optical Imaging of Brain Activity
10:05

A Large Lateral Craniotomy Procedure for Mesoscale Wide-field Optical Imaging of Brain Activity

Published on: May 7, 2017

Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields.

Chun-I Yeh1, Dajun Xing, Patrick E Williams

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. ciy@cns.nyu.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|August 27, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Receptive fields in V1 neurons are not stimulus-invariant. Different stimuli reveal distinct receptive field properties in superficial V1 layers, challenging linear models of visual processing.

More Related Videos

Examining Local Network Processing using Multi-contact Laminar Electrode Recording
13:40

Examining Local Network Processing using Multi-contact Laminar Electrode Recording

Published on: September 8, 2011

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Large Lateral Craniotomy Procedure for Mesoscale Wide-field Optical Imaging of Brain Activity
10:05

A Large Lateral Craniotomy Procedure for Mesoscale Wide-field Optical Imaging of Brain Activity

Published on: May 7, 2017

Examining Local Network Processing using Multi-contact Laminar Electrode Recording
13:40

Examining Local Network Processing using Multi-contact Laminar Electrode Recording

Published on: September 8, 2011

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual processing
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • The receptive field concept in visual neuroscience assumes stimulus invariance.
  • Common models, like the linear-nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) model, predict similar receptive fields regardless of stimulus ensemble.
  • This study investigates the validity of the stimulus-invariant receptive field concept in the primary visual cortex (V1).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare spatiotemporal receptive field maps of V1 neurons using two distinct stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli.
  • To determine if receptive field properties are consistent across different stimulus conditions.
  • To investigate the influence of intracortical interactions on V1 receptive fields.

Main Methods:

  • Spatiotemporal receptive field mapping of V1 neurons in macaque monkeys.
  • Utilized two different stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli.
  • Compared receptive field maps obtained from input layer 4C and superficial layers (2/3) of V1.

Main Results:

  • Receptive field maps agreed between stimulus ensembles for neurons in layer 4C.
  • Significant differences in receptive field maps were observed for neurons in superficial V1 layers (2/3).
  • Layer 2/3 neurons exhibited complex, multi-lobed receptive fields with Hartley stimuli, which simplified to single-lobed fields with sparse noise. Preferred orientation also varied significantly between stimuli for these neurons.

Conclusions:

  • The concept of a stimulus-invariant receptive field is challenged by these findings.
  • Intracortical interactions in superficial V1 layers significantly shape neuronal receptive field properties.
  • Existing linear models may not fully capture the complexity of V1 visual processing.