Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Current practice and outcomes of off-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass
Xiumei Sun1, Roger Michael Lim, Peter C Hill
1Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010-2975, USA.
Insights
Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery showed better outcomes than on-pump surgery, with lower mortality and fewer complications. Patients undergoing off-pump procedures experienced shorter hospital stays and less need for transfusions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Procedures
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease.
- Both on-pump (using cardiopulmonary bypass) and off-pump techniques are employed for CABG.
- Comparative outcome data between these techniques are crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) versus conventional on-pump CABG.
- To evaluate differences in operative mortality, major adverse events, and resource utilization between the two surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 3,637 patients undergoing OPCAB and 3,586 patients undergoing on-pump CABG from July 2001 to June 2006.
- Comparison of key outcome measures including operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, perioperative myocardial infarction, blood transfusion requirements, ventilation duration, and hospital length of stay.
- Statistical analysis to determine significant differences between the off-pump and on-pump groups.
Main Results:
- The off-pump group demonstrated significantly lower rates of operative mortality, permanent stroke, renal failure, and perioperative myocardial infarction compared to the on-pump group.
- Patients undergoing off-pump CABG required fewer blood transfusions, shorter durations of ventilatory support, and experienced shorter hospital stays.
- The on-pump group included a higher proportion of high-risk patients and those undergoing more complex procedures, potentially influencing outcome comparisons.
Conclusions:
- Off-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass is associated with improved early clinical outcomes and reduced resource utilization compared to on-pump CABG.
- These findings suggest potential benefits of the off-pump technique in reducing perioperative morbidity and improving patient recovery.
- Further research may be warranted to explore long-term outcomes and patient selection criteria for both surgical approaches.
Abstract:
Outcomes of off-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass were compared with those of the on-pump procedure. From July 2001 to June 2006, 3,637 patients with multivessel coronary disease underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass, and 3,586 patients had on-pump coronary artery bypass in our center. The rates of operative mortality, permanent stroke, renal failure and perioperative myocardial infarction were significantly lower in the off-pump group, and these patients required fewer blood transfusions, shorter durations of ventilatory support, and shorter hospital stays. However, the patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass were considered more high-risk and tended to have more complex procedures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

