Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

MOSFET: Enhancement Mode01:22

MOSFET: Enhancement Mode

Enhancement-mode MOSFETs are pivotal components in electronics, distinguished by their capacity to act as highly efficient switches. They are part of the larger family of metal-oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs). They are available in two types: p-channel and n-channel, each tailored to specific polarity operations.
In their basic form, enhancement-mode MOSFETs are typically non-conductive when the gate-source voltage (Vgs) is zero. This default 'off' state means no current...
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Overview of Electron Microscopy01:25

Overview of Electron Microscopy

The wavelengths of visible light ultimately limit the maximum theoretical resolution of images created by light microscopes. Most light microscopes can only magnify 1000X, and a few can magnify up to 1500X. Electrons, like electromagnetic radiation, can behave like waves, but with wavelengths of 0.005 nm, they produce significantly greater resolution up to 0.05 nm as compared to 500 nm for visible light. An electron microscope (EM) can create a sharp image that is magnified up to 2,000,000X.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distortion optimization for wide-angle computational cameras.

Optics express·2018
Same author

Convergence of backward-error-propagation learning in photorefractive crystals.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Cascaded-grating holography for artificial neural networks.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Analysis of weighted fan-out/fan-in volume holographic optical interconnections.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Optoelectronic resonator neural networks.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Holographic associative memory with nonlinearities in the correlation domain.

Applied optics·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo
09:36

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

Published on: March 19, 2016

Effects of operating mode on electrooptic spatial light modulator resolution and sensitivity.

Y Owechko, A R Tanguay

    Optics Letters
    |August 29, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary

    The study models electrooptic spatial light modulator performance, revealing that bulk charge distributions significantly impact resolution and sensitivity. Device performance, particularly for PROM and PRIZ, depends heavily on operating mode and dielectric layer quality.

    More Related Videos

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
    08:39

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

    Published on: January 28, 2019

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo
    09:36

    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

    Published on: March 19, 2016

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
    08:39

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

    Published on: January 28, 2019

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    Area of Science:

    • Physics
    • Materials Science
    • Electrical Engineering

    Background:

    • Electrooptic spatial light modulators (SLMs) like PROM and PRIZ are crucial for optical information processing.
    • Their performance metrics, including resolution and sensitivity, are known to vary with operating conditions.
    • Understanding these variations is key to optimizing SLM applications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To model the performance of PROM and PRIZ electrooptic spatial light modulators.
    • To investigate the influence of bulk charge distributions on device resolution and sensitivity.
    • To determine the impact of operating mode and dielectric blocking layer quality on SLM performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized theoretical modeling to incorporate bulk charge effects.
    • Analyzed the influence of bulk charge on longitudinal and transverse electric fields.
    • Simulated the performance of PROM and PRIZ devices under different operating modes.

    Main Results:

    • Successfully modeled the opposite dependences of PROM and PRIZ resolution and sensitivity on operating mode.
    • Demonstrated that bulk charge distributions significantly affect device performance.
    • Identified operating mode and dielectric blocking layer quality as critical factors influencing relative device performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of operating mode is a primary determinant of PROM and PRIZ device performance.
    • The quality of dielectric blocking layers critically impacts the relative performance of these SLMs.
    • Bulk charge effects must be considered for accurate modeling and optimization of electrooptic spatial light modulators.