Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER01:29

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
Caspases01:24

Caspases

Caspase, a family of cysteine proteases, serve as effectors in apoptosis. The ced3 gene in C.elegans was first identified to be involved in apoptosis. This gene encodes the ced-3 caspase that is similar to the interleukin-1-beta converting enzyme or ICE in mammals. In addition to apoptosis, caspases also function in the inflammatory response. Inflammatory caspases are essential in activating pro-inflammatory cytokines that recruit immune cells and block the replication of pathogens inside cells.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Template-based RNA structure prediction advanced through a blind code competition.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Cryo-EM Analysis in CASP16.

Proteins·2025
Same author

Decoding non-coding SNPs: systems genomics modelling dissects the heterogeneity of IBD.

Molecular systems biology·2025
Same author

Progress and Bottlenecks for Deep Learning in Computational Structure Biology: CASP Round XVI.

Proteins·2025
Same author

Assessment of Protein Complex Predictions in CASP16: Are We Making Progress?

Proteins·2025
Same author

Assessment of Nucleic Acid Structure Prediction in CASP16.

Proteins·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions.

Domenico Cozzetto1, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Anna Tramontano

  • 1Department of Biochemical Sciences, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy. domenico.cozzetto@uniroma1.it

Proteins
|August 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Assessing protein structure prediction accuracy is crucial. Consensus-based methods consistently outperform single-model approaches for estimating model quality, as confirmed in the 2008 CASP experiment.

More Related Videos

Exploring Caspase Mutations and Post-Translational Modification by Molecular Modeling Approaches
05:56

Exploring Caspase Mutations and Post-Translational Modification by Molecular Modeling Approaches

Published on: October 13, 2022

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Exploring Caspase Mutations and Post-Translational Modification by Molecular Modeling Approaches
05:56

Exploring Caspase Mutations and Post-Translational Modification by Molecular Modeling Approaches

Published on: October 13, 2022

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Bioinformatics
  • Protein Structure Prediction

Background:

  • Model quality assessment estimates the accuracy of protein structure predictions.
  • The Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) introduced a category for this in 2006.
  • A repeat experiment in 2008 evaluated methods for assessing prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of methods for estimating protein model quality.
  • To compare the accuracy of consensus-based versus single-model approaches.
  • To assess the correlation between predicted and observed correctness measures.

Main Methods:

  • Participants estimated the correctness of protein models from automatic servers.
  • Estimates were provided for both entire models and individual amino acids.
  • Local error estimates were assigned to predicted residues by tertiary structure prediction groups.

Main Results:

  • Consensus-based methods demonstrated significantly better performance than single-model methods.
  • This finding aligns with results from the previous CASP experiment.
  • Correlation analysis between predicted and observed correctness formed the basis of the assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Consensus-based approaches remain superior for protein model quality assessment.
  • The 2008 CASP experiment validated the effectiveness of these methods.
  • Accurate quality estimation is vital for advancing protein structure prediction.