Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Differences in the mechanical behavior of cortical bone between compression and tension when subjected to progressive
Jeffry S Nyman1, Huijie Leng, X Neil Dong
1Vanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37215, United States.
Human cortical bone dissipates energy differently under tension versus compression. Compression favors plastic and viscoelastic deformation, while tension favors surface energy release, impacting fracture resistance.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Orthopedic Research
Background:
- Bone's hierarchical structure of collagen and minerals optimizes fracture resistance.
- The predominant strain mode in bone influences its energy dissipation capabilities.
- Cortical bone's response to tensile versus compressive forces may differ significantly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate energy dissipation mechanisms in human cortical bone under uniaxial tension and compression.
- To compare the differences in bone's mechanical response and failure pathways between tension and compression.
- To elucidate tissue-level failure mechanisms relevant to bone fracture.
Main Methods:
- Human cadaveric tibial bone specimens were subjected to progressive uniaxial tension and compression loading.
- Mechanical properties including stress, strain, modulus, and stress relaxation were measured.
- Three distinct pathways of energy dissipation were quantified for both loading modes.
Main Results:
- Bone dissipated more energy via permanent and viscoelastic deformation during compression compared to tension.
- Greater energy was dissipated through surface energy release in tension than in compression.
- Modulus loss, an indicator of damage accumulation, was similar in both tension and compression, despite differences in plastic and viscoelastic properties.
Conclusions:
- Cortical bone exhibits distinct energy dissipation strategies depending on the mode of loading (tension vs. compression).
- Differences in damage morphology likely explain the varied energy dissipation mechanisms.
- Understanding these tissue-level failure mechanisms is crucial for explaining bone fracture causes.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Compact Bone
Compact bone, also called cortical bone, is the denser, stronger of the two types of bone tissue. It is found under the periosteum and in the diaphyses of long bones, where it provides support and protection. The microscopic structural unit of compact bone is called an osteon, or haversian system. Each osteon is composed of concentric rings of calcified...
Plastic Behavior

