Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopia Progression in Adolescents.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopic Maculopathy.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Predictors of Lesion Detection in a 12-Year Oral Cancer Screening Program: A Cohort Study in Northern Portugal.

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology·2026
Same author

High Utilisation Behaviour in Emergency Departments: Predictors in Baixo Alentejo Region.

Portuguese journal of public health·2026
Same author

Building public health leadership: design, implementation and outcomes of the WHO European autumn school on quality of care and patient safety.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Measuring Antimicrobial Prescribing Quality and Driving Behavioral Change: A Call to Action Against Antimicrobial Resistance.

Acta medica portuguesa·2026
Same journal

When criterion control in face matching induces correlation: Commentary on Baker et al. (2026).

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

The morality of harm.

Paulo Sousa1, Colin Holbrook, Jared Piazza

  • 1Institute of Cognition and Culture, Queen's University, Belfast, 2-4 Fitzwilliam Street, BT71NN Belfast, UK. psousa@qub.ac.uk

Cognition
|September 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People view harmful actions involving injustice as authority-independent, challenging prior research on moral judgments. This study explores the relationship between harm, injustice, and moral acceptability in complex scenarios.

More Related Videos

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The distinction between moral and conventional norms is a key area in developmental psychology.
  • Previous research suggests harm is perceived as a universal moral concern, independent of authority.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether people perceive harmful actions, particularly those involving injustice or rights violations, as authority-independent and general in scope.
  • To re-examine the relationship between harm, injustice, and moral judgments in complex, real-world scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • A modified replication of Kelly et al.'s (2007) study was conducted.
  • Participants' judgments of harmful actions in complex contexts (e.g., prisoner interrogation, military training) were analyzed.
  • Rationales behind participants' judgments were considered alongside their decisions.

Main Results:

  • Results largely confirmed the hypothesis that actions involving harm and injustice are judged as authority-independent.
  • Participants' judgments and rationales indicated a general scope for these moral concerns.
  • Findings suggest a modification of traditional hypotheses regarding harm and moral judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Harmful actions intertwined with injustice or rights violations are consistently viewed as universally wrong, irrespective of authority.
  • This challenges the notion that such judgments are context-dependent or authority-influenced in complex situations.
  • The study refines our understanding of the moral/conventional distinction and the perception of harm.