Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN1412
P Knapp1, D K Raynor, J Silcock
1School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, LS2 9LN, UK. p.r.knapp@leeds.ac.uk
Improving clinical trial consent forms is crucial. User testing of the TGN1412 trial information sheet revealed significant comprehension issues, but revisions enhanced participant understanding.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial methodology
- Informed consent processes
- Patient education materials
Background:
- Participant information sheets for clinical trials, especially early-phase studies, are often complex and difficult for patients to understand.
- Current readability testing methods for trial documents are insufficient to assess how well participants comprehend the information.
- Ensuring adequate informed consent is a significant challenge in clinical research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the user-testing performance of the original TGN1412 phase I clinical trial participant information sheet.
- To assess the impact of revising the content and design of the TGN1412 participant information sheet on user comprehension.
- To determine the effectiveness of performance-based user testing in identifying weaknesses in clinical trial materials.
Main Methods:
- An independent-groups design was employed to test the original TGN1412 participant information sheet.
- Members of the public were asked to read the original sheet and answer questions about 21 key trial aspects.
- The information sheet was rewritten and redesigned, then tested on a new group using the same 21-item questionnaire.
Main Results:
- Participants struggled to locate and understand critical information on the original TGN1412 information sheet, with many failing to find answers to questions about placebo, follow-up, and emergency contacts.
- The revised information sheet demonstrated substantial improvement, with all 20 participants successfully finding and understanding answers to 17 out of 21 questions.
- User testing revealed that the original sheet inadequately informed participants for consent, highlighting specific areas of confusion.
Conclusions:
- The original TGN1412 participant information sheet did not adequately inform participants, potentially compromising the informed consent process.
- Revising the content and design of the information sheet significantly improved participant comprehension and usability.
- Performance-based user testing is a valuable method for evaluating and enhancing the clarity and effectiveness of clinical trial participant materials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Preclinical Development: Overview
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
