Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Can anchor models explain inverted-U effects in facial judgments?
Alain Mignault1, Arijit Bhaumik, Avi Chaudhuri
1Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1. alain@ego.psych.mcgill.ca
Abstract:
Researchers in a variety of disciplines have found that participants take less time and generate less diversity of responses when judging stimuli towards the ends of a scale than when judging those near the center. Three types of models, connectionist, exemplar, and anchor models, can account for these inverted-U effects. Anchor models assume that stimuli near the ends of the scale are used as anchors to compare with the other stimuli, implying that anchor representations are activated for each judgment. Therefore, participants should learn the anchors better than the other stimuli. Participants were 40 students from the Department of Psychology at McGill University (5 men; M age = 20.5 yr.; SD = 1.7). The experiment involved two tasks: first participants judged facial gender and then performed a recognition task. The results showed no correlation between the position on the gender scale and recognition accuracy. Several hypotheses were offered to explain these results.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
First Impression
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Stereotype Content Model
Fundamental Attribution Error

