Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) influenza A/H1N1

Shawn Vasoo1, Jane Stevens, Kamaljit Singh

  • 1Department of Medicine, Rush University Medicial Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Insights

Rapid antigen tests for pandemic influenza A/H1N1 showed low to moderate sensitivity. Patients with flu-like symptoms and negative rapid tests require further reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diagnostic Testing

Background:

  • Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus poses a significant public health threat.
  • Accurate and rapid diagnostic tools are crucial for timely patient management and disease control.
  • The diagnostic performance of available rapid antigen tests for this specific strain needed evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity of three commercially available rapid influenza antigen tests for the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of BD Directigen EZ Flu A+B, BinaxNOW Influenza A&B, and QuickVue Influenza A+B Test.

Main Methods:

  • Sensitivity testing of three rapid influenza antigen tests.
  • Utilized samples from patients with pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus infection.
  • Calculated sensitivity percentages for each test.

Main Results:

  • BD Directigen EZ Flu A+B test sensitivity: 46.7%.
  • BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test sensitivity: 38.3%.
  • QuickVue Influenza A+B Test sensitivity: 53.3%.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated rapid antigen tests demonstrate low to moderate sensitivity for pandemic influenza A/H1N1.
  • Negative results from these rapid tests should be confirmed with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in patients with influenza-like illness.
  • RT-PCR is recommended for definitive diagnosis when rapid antigen test results are negative.

Related Concept Videos