Is refraction with a hand-held autorefractometer useful in addition to visual acuity testing and questionnaires in

Toshihiko Matsuo1, Chie Matsuo, Keiko Kio

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Okayama University Medical School and Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. matsuot@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp

Acta Medica Okayama
|September 4, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Adding autorefraction to Japan

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Ophthalmology
  • Public Health Screening
  • Diagnostic Technology

Background:

  • Japan's vision screening for 3.5-year-olds involves questionnaires, home testing, nurse/medical officer assessments, and ophthalmologist exams.
  • The current system aims to detect vision problems in young children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if adding autorefraction improves eye problem detection in a Japanese preschool vision-screening program.
  • To assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating autorefraction into existing screening protocols.

Main Methods:

  • A hand-held autorefractometer was used for refraction testing alongside standard visual acuity and inspection.
  • 265 children aged 3.5 years underwent 6 sessions of autorefraction.
  • Referrals to ophthalmologists were based on established visual acuity and refractive error criteria (myopia ≥3D, hyperopia ≥1D, astigmatism ≥2D).

Main Results:

  • Autorefraction identified only one additional case of eye disease.
  • The number of children referred for ophthalmologist examination tripled.
  • Referrals based solely on refractive error criteria primarily identified non-serious refractive errors.

Conclusions:

  • Autorefraction did not significantly enhance the detection of eye diseases in this 3.5-year-old cohort.
  • The addition of autorefraction substantially increased referral rates without a proportional increase in serious diagnoses.
  • From a cost-effectiveness perspective, autorefraction is not recommended for this specific vision-screening program.

Related Concept Videos