Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Deliberate indifference in jail suicide litigation: a fatal judicial loophole
1School of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-7016, USA. shatcher@uga.edu
Abstract:
Numerous national lawsuits have alleged that certain U.S. jails and detention centers are at fault for suicides that occur within their facilities. However, a significant number of court decisions have released the jail of liability. This article contends that the judicial rationale used in deciding the standard for liability, deliberate indifference, favors ignorance and has created an environment of ambiguity for jail suicide prevention policies. Cases involving custodial suicides and the recommended prevention policies developed by organizations affiliated with the U.S. correctional system are discussed. These are supplemented with anecdotal data from key informants working in the system. The analyses are followed by implications for augmenting existing practices through proactive policy changes to support enhanced systems of care.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Torts I
Intentional...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Ethical Dilemmas II

