Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Cellular Injury II: Classification01:21

Cellular Injury II: Classification

Cellular injury is any process that disrupts a cell’s ability to maintain homeostasis, leading to structural or functional changes. It is broadly classified based on etiology (cause) and mechanism of damage.Classification by EtiologyCellular injury may result from several causes. Hypoxic injury happens due to reduced oxygen delivery, most commonly from inadequate blood supply, such as arterial obstruction; for example, coronary artery thrombosis can cause myocardial infarction. Chemical injury...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility study of computational occupational dosimetry: evaluating a proof-of-concept in an endovascular and interventional cardiology setting.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2022
Same author

Local probe of single phonon dynamics in warm ion crystals.

Nature communications·2017
Same author

Development of multi-disciplinary breast cancer care in Southern Malawi.

European journal of cancer care·2017
Same author

Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2016
Same author

Improvement in symptoms of obstructive sleep apnoea in children following tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2016
Same author

An evidence-based system for health surveillance of occupational divers.

Internal medicine journal·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification
07:01

Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification

Published on: August 6, 2015

Causation in occupational injury.

J Kennelly1, D Gorman

  • 1Departments of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Glen Innes, Auckland, New Zealand. j.kennelly@auckland.ac.nz

Internal Medicine Journal
|September 8, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper provides a process for evaluating medical evidence in occupational injury claims. Understanding probability is key for medical and legal professionals to determine the cause of work-related injuries or diseases.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification
07:01

Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification

Published on: August 6, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • Medical Law
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Occupational injury assessments are common for specialists but lack standardized legal training.
  • A common understanding gap exists between medical and legal professionals regarding compensation systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a clear process for judging medical scientific evidence in occupational injury and disease cases.
  • To bridge the understanding gap between medical and legal fields in evaluating work-related health issues.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing processes for occupational injury assessment.
  • Analysis of legal concepts such as balance of probabilities and scientific probability.
  • Development of a sequential approach for determining causation.

Main Results:

  • A structured process for evaluating medical evidence in occupational injury claims is proposed.
  • Emphasis on understanding probability concepts is crucial for accurate assessments.
  • Causation determination relies on a sequential consideration of general and specific factors.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed process aims to enhance clarity and consistency in judging occupational injury cases.
  • Improved understanding of probability and causation is essential for both medical and legal professionals.
  • This framework supports more accurate and equitable compensation decisions for occupational injuries and diseases.