Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients with symmetric Parkinson's disease do poorly with subthalamic stimulation.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Validation of the Norwegian version of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.

Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders·2026
Same author

Validation of the German Version of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Scale (MDS-NMS).

Movement disorders clinical practice·2025
Same author

Influence of the level of education on cognitive function in Parkinson's disease.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2025
Same author

MDS PD e-Diary: A New Patient-Centered Digital Tool in Development for People with Parkinson's Disease.

Movement disorders clinical practice·2025
Same author

Validation of the French Translation of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (MDS-NMS) in Parkinson's Disease.

Movement disorders clinical practice·2025
Same journal

Comment on "Efficacy and safety of conventional immunosuppressant therapies in elderly patients with Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A target trial emulation study".

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same journal

Increasing incidence of varicella-zoster virus meningitis in Japan, 2011-2022.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Excellent agreement between automated deep learning-based and manual diffusion-weighted imaging infarct volume measurements in hyperacute stroke".

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same journal

Shifting from alteplase to tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: Progress, promise, and perils.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same journal

Time-resolved GluCEST MRI of acute glutamate-related signal changes following kainic acid administration.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Real-world timing of early anticoagulation therapy in intracerebral hemorrhage patients with atrial fibrillation".

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Composite rating scales.

Pablo Martinez-Martin1

  • 1Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit, Alzheimer Center, Reina Sofia Foundation, Spain. pmartinez@isciii.es

Journal of the Neurological Sciences
|September 8, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review examines rating scales used in clinical assessments. It highlights issues with summing ordinal scores and discusses Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for scale development.

More Related Videos

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Measurement Theory

Background:

  • Rating scales are crucial clinical assessment tools, often using ordinal measurements.
  • Single-item scales offer simplicity but can lack clarity and responsiveness.
  • Multi-item scales allow detailed evaluation of complex constructs, potentially improving precision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review theoretical frameworks for developing rating scales.
  • To critically evaluate the summation of item scores in multi-item scales.
  • To discuss the implications of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of psychometric theories.
  • Analysis of measurement properties of rating scales.
  • Discussion of score aggregation strategies.

Main Results:

  • Summative scoring of ordinal data presents theoretical challenges.
  • Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory offer different approaches to scale construction.
  • No single theory provides a perfect solution for rating scale development.

Conclusions:

  • Careful consideration of theoretical frameworks is essential for robust rating scale design.
  • Further research is needed to optimize rating scale methodologies.
  • Judicious application of psychometric principles enhances clinical assessment accuracy.