Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

Routes of Persuasion

Routes of Persuasion

Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?

Motivational Cycle

Motivational Cycle

The motivational cycle is a key concept that explains how individuals are motivated to meet their needs. At its core, the cycle revolves around four distinct stages: need, drive, goal-directed behavior, and goal achievement. These stages respond to imbalances in the body or mind, prompting actions that restore balance.
The cycle begins with a need. This need can arise from various conditions, such as hunger, thirst, or temperature changes. For instance, when an individual feels cold, their body...

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or drive, pushes...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

Frames: Problem Solving II

Frames: Problem Solving II

Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

On the Impact of Chronic Message Fatigue on Informational and Behavioral Outcomes.

Health communication·2026

Same author

Developing Measures of Watershed Knowledge.

Environmental management·2026

Same author

Intervention in Health Misinformation Using Large Language Models for Automated Detection, Thematic Analysis, and Inoculation: Case Study on COVID-19.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Same author

Cellular immune changes during severe antisense oligonucleotide-associated thrombocytopenia in a nonhuman primate model.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2025

Same author

Racial Influences, Social Media Usage, and Vaccine Hesitancy: A National Survey Across Vaccine Topics.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2025

Same author

Does Character-Audience Matching Increase the Persuasive Impact of Anti-Sugar-Sweetened-Beverage (SSB) Consumption Messages?

Health communication·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

Message frames interact with motivational systems to determine depth of message processing.

Lijiang Shen¹, James Price Dillard

¹Department of Speech Communication, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. lshen@uga.edu

Health Communication

|September 8, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Message framing effects on processing depth are inconsistent. This study suggests framing interacts with individual differences in behavioral systems, not a universal main effect, offering new insights into message processing and persuasion.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

Psychology
Social Psychology
Communication Studies

Background:

Theoretical perspectives suggest negatively framed messages are processed more deeply than positively framed ones.
A recent meta-analysis, however, found no significant difference in processing depth based on message framing.
This inconsistency necessitates exploring alternative explanations for framing effects.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate methodological and theoretical explanations for the inconsistent findings regarding message framing and depth of processing.
To examine whether statistical artifacts due to maldistributed data or interactions with individual differences account for the lack of a main effect.
To explore the moderating role of individual differences in behavioral systems on message processing depth.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted with 286 and 252 participants, respectively.
Tobit regression analysis was employed to address potential limitations of maldistributed data.
Individual differences were measured using scales assessing the behavioral activation system and behavioral inhibition system.

Main Results:

One experiment demonstrated a main effect of framing on processing depth, while the other did not.
Both experiments revealed a significant interaction: processing depth correlated with the behavioral activation system under advantage framing and the behavioral inhibition system under disadvantage framing.
Tobit regression analysis helped to overcome data limitations and provided a more nuanced understanding of framing effects.

Conclusions:

The absence of a consistent main effect of message framing on processing depth may be accurate.
Framing effects on message processing appear to be moderated by individual differences in behavioral activation and inhibition systems.
Future research should consider individual differences when examining the impact of message framing on cognitive processing and persuasion.