Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
Validity and reliability of assessment tools for measuring unsupported sitting in people with a spinal cord injury
Claire L Boswell-Ruys1, Daina L Sturnieks, Lisa A Harvey
1Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia. c.boswell-ruys@powmri.edu.au
Objectives:
To develop simple tests to assess the abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) to sit unsupported and to assess the construct validity and test-retest reliability of these tests.
Design:
Cross-sectional comparisons, convenience sample.
Setting:
Biomechanical laboratory.
Participants:
People (N=30) with SCI between the C6 and the L2 level of 2 months to 37 years duration before assessment. The sample was stratified by impairment level (at T8) and time since injury (1 y postinjury).
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
On 2 separate occasions, participants performed tests that measured the distance of upper-body sway and maximal torso leaning, errors made during a coordinated stability task, timed dressing/undressing of the upper body and alternating arm reaching, and percentage change in seated upper body/arm reaching.
Results:
All tests showed good construct validity in that they distinguished between participants with higher (C6-T7) and lower (T8-L2) level impairments (P<.05) and between participants with acute (< or =1 y) and chronic (>1 y) lesions (P<.05). The tests also showed good to excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coeffiecient(3,1) range, .51-.91).
Conclusions:
These simple and quick-to-administer tests have both construct validity and test-retest reliability. They would be appropriate for research and clinical purposes to quantify the abilities of people with SCI to sit unsupported.
