Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Gefitinib: a second look. Non-small cell lung cancer: still very disappointing
Abstract:
(1) In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, whatever the stage, the benefits of cytotoxic chemotherapy are limited. There is no consensus second-line chemotherapy after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; (2) Gefitinib is an EGF (epidermal growth factor) receptor inhibitor available in France for named-patient compassionate treatment of non-small cell lung cancer when first-line chemotherapy fails; (3) When we examined gefitinib in this indication in 2004 and 2006, we were unable to reach a firm conclusion on its risk-benefit balance; (4) Preliminary analysis of a placebo-controlled trial in 255 patients unexpectedly showed that adding gefitinib to chemoradiotherapy followed by docetaxel shortened median survival time, from 35 months with placebo to only 23 months (p=0.013). Another trial in 603 patients showed no difference in survival between patients receiving 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy versus patients receiving 3 cycles of the same chemotherapy followed by gefinitib[sic]; (5) A few rather unreliable data suggest that gefitinib may be more effective in certain subgroups, but there are no reports of relevant prospective trials of sufficient size and with sufficient follow-up; (6) In second-line treatment, there are 4 unblinded trials versus docetaxel. One trial in 1466 patients suggested that gefitinib was "non-inferior" to docetaxel, but this non-inferiority was not confirmed in another trial in 489 patients. Half of the patients enrolled in these trials died within 8 months. Two other trials in 161 and 141 patients showed no difference in survival between patients treated with gefinitib[sic] and those treated with docetaxel; (7) The adverse effects observed in these trials confirmed what was already known about gefitinib: epithelial toxicity frequently leads to potentially severe skin rash and diarrhoea, as well as rare but life-threatening interstitial pneumonia; (8) In practice, there is no reason to use gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer, except perhaps when there are no other available options and in a subgroup of patients who might benefit and who agree to participate in a comparative trial.
Insights
Gefitinib offers limited benefits for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with trials showing no survival advantage and significant side effects. Its use is not recommended outside of clinical trials or compassionate use cases.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Pharmacology
Background:
- Cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited benefits in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across all stages.
- There is no established consensus for second-line chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based treatment failure.
- Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor inhibitor, is available for compassionate use in NSCLC after first-line chemotherapy failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the risk-benefit balance of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- To assess the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as a treatment option for NSCLC.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of preliminary data from a placebo-controlled trial (255 patients) combining gefitinib with chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel.
- Review of multiple trials comparing gefitinib with chemotherapy or docetaxel in first- and second-line NSCLC treatment.
- Examination of adverse event data from gefitinib trials.
Main Results:
- Adding gefitinib to chemoradiotherapy followed by docetaxel unexpectedly shortened median survival (35 to 23 months, p=0.013).
- Trials showed no survival difference between standard chemotherapy and gefitinib combinations or gefitinib versus docetaxel in second-line settings.
- Gefitinib's known adverse effects, including skin rash, diarrhea, and interstitial pneumonia, were confirmed.
Conclusions:
- The risk-benefit balance of gefitinib in NSCLC remains unfavorable based on current evidence.
- There is currently no compelling reason to use gefitinib in NSCLC outside of specific compassionate use scenarios or comparative clinical trials.
- Further research is needed to identify potential subgroups that may benefit from gefitinib, but robust data are lacking.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
13:34A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...