Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Microbial Phylogeny01:28

Microbial Phylogeny

Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why recombination hotspots?

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

H3K27me3 spreading organizes canonical PRC1 chromatin architecture to regulate developmental programs.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Empirical Validation of the Nearly Neutral Theory at Divergence and Population-Genomic Scales Using 144 Placental Mammal Genomes.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Androgen activity in the male embryonic hindbrain drives lethal PFA ependymoma.

Nature·2026
Same author

EMPIRICAL VALIDATION OF THE NEARLY NEUTRAL THEORY AT DIVERGENCE AND POPULATION GENOMIC SCALE USING 144 PLACENTAL MAMMALS GENOMES.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same journal

Globins in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii shed new light on hemoglobin evolution in bilaterians.

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
Same journal

Is there any intron sliding in mammals?

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
Same journal

The evolution of the huntingtin-associated protein 40 (HAP40) in conjunction with huntingtin.

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
Same journal

You don't have the guts: a diverse set of fungi survive passage through Macrotermes bellicosus termite guts.

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
Same journal

Mitochondrial DNAs provide insight into trypanosome phylogeny and molecular evolution.

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
Same journal

Stress-related changes in leukocyte profiles and telomere shortening in the shortest-lived tetrapod, Furcifer labordi.

BMC evolutionary biology·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Fast optimization of statistical potentials for structurally constrained phylogenetic models.

Cécile Bonnard1, Claudia L Kleinman, Nicolas Rodrigue

  • 1Département d'Informatique, LIRMM, 161 rue Ada, 34392 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. cecile.bonnard@umontreal.ca

BMC Evolutionary Biology
|September 11, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a faster method to optimize statistical potentials for protein design models. This new approach significantly reduces computation time while maintaining accuracy, aiding molecular evolutionary studies.

More Related Videos

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein design
  • Molecular evolution

Background:

  • Statistical approaches are crucial for protein design and molecular evolutionary studies.
  • Structurally constrained (SC) models use statistical potentials for sequence-structure compatibility.
  • Previous work established a joint potential optimization framework using maximum likelihood but required intensive computation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient alternative for optimizing knowledge-based potentials in SC models.
  • To compare the performance and accuracy of the new method against existing approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a leave-one-out optimization procedure.
  • Utilized fast gradient descent algorithms for optimization.
  • Assessed potential parameters and phylogenetic performance using Bayes factor evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The leave-one-out potential yields results comparable to the joint potential approach.
  • Achieved a significant reduction in computational time (up to 1,000-fold).
  • The method demonstrates high accuracy in parameter estimation and phylogenetic analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed leave-one-out optimization method is a computationally efficient alternative.
  • Its speed makes it suitable for designing and evaluating potentials with large datasets.
  • Facilitates empirical evaluation of alternative potentials in protein design and evolutionary studies.