Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A 3D pooled PBMC-organoid co-culture platform for profiling immune susceptibility and PD-1 blockade response in gastric cancer.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Integrated CT-based assessment of muscle and adiposity for risk stratification in advanced pancreatobiliary cancer.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

Oncolytic vaccinia virus JX-594 shows subtype-specific activity and candidate biomarkers in gastric cancer cell lines.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A Phase Ib/II Study of Pemigatinib in Combination with Paclitaxel in Patients with Gastric Cancer with FGFs/FGFRs Alterations.

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of metastatic gastric cancer in South Korea: real-world evidence from retrospective electronic medical records data.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Efficacy of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic cancer (NeoFOL-R): study protocol for an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BMC cancer·2026
Same journal

Clinico-Pathologic Features of Adult Erdheim-Chester Disease in South Korea: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KCSG LY22-15).

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same journal

RETRACTION: Everolimus Plus Ku0063794 Regimen Promotes Anticancer Effects against Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells through the Paradoxical Inhibition of Autophagy.

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same journal

Up and Down of Cancer Research and Treatment (CRT)'s Journal Impact Factor at the Moment of CRT's 60th Anniversary.

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same journal

Tumor-Intrinsic Hepatocyte Arm-Level Genomic States Shape Immunotherapy Response Heterogeneity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same journal

Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Esophagectomy.

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same journal

A Multinational, Retrospective, Real-World Study: Treatment Patterns in Patients With HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Beyond First-line in East Asia (HER2+ GASTA Study).

Cancer research and treatment·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

An attempt for combining microarray data sets by adjusting gene expressions.

Ki-Yeol Kim1, Se Hyun Kim, Dong Hyuk Ki

  • 1Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.

Cancer Research and Treatment
|September 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a simple integration method to combine microarray data from different sources, reducing experimental bias and improving data reliability. This approach enhances the detection of accurate biological information from diverse datasets.

Keywords:
Different RNA sourcesDifferent platformsGene expressionIntegration methodMicroarraySystematic effects

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Determining Genetic Expression Profiles in C. elegans Using Microarray and Real-time PCR
10:27

Determining Genetic Expression Profiles in C. elegans Using Microarray and Real-time PCR

Published on: July 30, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Determining Genetic Expression Profiles in C. elegans Using Microarray and Real-time PCR
10:27

Determining Genetic Expression Profiles in C. elegans Using Microarray and Real-time PCR

Published on: July 30, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Microarray technology is susceptible to experimental biases from diverse platforms and RNA sources.
  • These systematic effects hinder reliable analysis of multiple microarray datasets, leading to inconsistent results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a straightforward method for integrating microarray data from varied experimental conditions.
  • To enhance the reliability and consistency of information extracted from combined microarray datasets.

Main Methods:

  • A gene-by-gene transformation of gene expression ratios based on data set distributions.
  • Utilized two microarray datasets from different RNA sources to evaluate the integration method.
  • Employed a novel 'mixture score' to quantify the efficiency of data integration.

Main Results:

  • The integration method successfully intermixed datasets from different RNA sources, reducing bias.
  • Observed a 24.2% increase in the mixture score, indicating improved data integration.
  • The combined dataset maintained the inter-group relationships present in the original separated datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively adjusts for systematic biases, including source effects.
  • Integrating microarray data increases sample size, leading to more reliable findings and reduced false negatives.
  • This approach enhances the overall quality and interpretability of multi-dataset microarray analyses.