Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management01:25

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

Pharmacologic intervention is crucial in treating cardiac arrest patients during ACLS or Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. The ACLS algorithms guide the administration of specific drugs based on the patient's cardiac arrest rhythm, which includes pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), asystole, and pulseless electrical activity (PEA).EpinephrineIndication: Epinephrine is the first-line drug for all cardiac arrest rhythms.Mechanism of Action: Epinephrine...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult01:21

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or CPR, is a life-saving emergency procedure performed when a person's heart has stopped beating or they are no longer breathing. The foundation of CPR is Basic Life Support (BLS), which focuses on the early recognition of cardiac arrest, the immediate start of high-quality chest compressions, and the timely use of an automated external defibrillator (AED).Assessing Responsiveness and Checking the Carotid PulseWhen approaching an unresponsive person, first ensure...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Institutionalized Misdiagnosis.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Author Response: The Fundamental Concept of Death-Controversies and Clinical Relevance: The UDDA Revision Series.

Neurology·2024
Same author

The Fundamental Concept of Death-Controversies and Clinical Relevance: The UDDA Revision Series.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Where Brain Death Is Concerned-NOT Debate BUT Action.

The Linacre quarterly·2023
Same author

Neuropathologic findings in a young woman 4 years following declaration of brain death: case analysis and literature review.

Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology·2022
Same author

POINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? Yes.

Chest·2022
Same journal

Counseling the Abortion-Vulnerable Patient.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
Same journal

Turnaway Study Report Unethically Violated Participants' Privacy and Misleads Public with a Non-Representative Sample, Selective Reporting, and Overstated Conclusions.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
Same journal

Challenging Vavřička: Questioning Compatibility of the Mandatory Tetanus Vaccination with ECHR.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
Same journal

First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
Same journal

A Statement on Abortion by 170 Obstetricians/Gynecologists after the Reversal of Roe v Wade.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
Same journal

Misleading Statements About "Life of the Mother" Exceptions in Pro-life Laws Require Correction.

Issues in law & medicine·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

Brain death: can it be resuscitated?

D Alan Shewmon1

  • 1David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, USA.

Issues in Law & Medicine
|September 15, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The determination of death, particularly brain death, remains a complex ethical and medical challenge. A recent bioethics council report reexamines this issue, offering new perspectives but not a definitive solution.

More Related Videos

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

Mouse Cardiac Arrest Model for Brain Imaging and Brain Physiology Monitoring During Ischemia and Resuscitation
07:18

Mouse Cardiac Arrest Model for Brain Imaging and Brain Physiology Monitoring During Ischemia and Resuscitation

Published on: April 14, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

Mouse Cardiac Arrest Model for Brain Imaging and Brain Physiology Monitoring During Ischemia and Resuscitation
07:18

Mouse Cardiac Arrest Model for Brain Imaging and Brain Physiology Monitoring During Ischemia and Resuscitation

Published on: April 14, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Neurology
  • Philosophy of Death

Background:

  • The definition of death, especially concerning irreversible brain destruction, has been debated for decades.
  • Existing frameworks struggle to definitively classify patients with destroyed brains as dead versus irreversibly comatose.
  • The President's Council on Bioethics has released a white paper addressing these complex issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reexamine the complex topic of the determination of death.
  • To analyze major positions on brain death and irreversible coma.
  • To propose and evaluate a new solution for defining death.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review and analysis of existing bioethical positions on death determination.
  • Critical examination of the concept of brain death versus irreversible coma.
  • Evaluation of a novel proposed solution from the President's Council on Bioethics.

Main Results:

  • The Council's white paper offers a thoughtful reexamination of the determination of death.
  • It provides a helpful analysis of various stances on brain death.
  • A new proposed solution is presented, though it does not fully resolve the issue.

Conclusions:

  • The report is commendable for its humility and honest confrontation of potential errors.
  • While not definitively solving the problem, the reexamination advances the discussion on death determination.
  • The ethical and medical complexities surrounding brain death persist.