Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
A Toosi1, R L Fernando, J C M Dekkers
1Department of Animal Science and Center for Integrated Animal Genomics, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.
Genomic selection (GS) in livestock can effectively use crossbred and admixed data for training prediction equations, even without explicit breed composition information. This approach maintains high accuracy for selecting purebreds for crossbred performance, especially with high-density markers.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Genomic selection (GS) is crucial for livestock breeding, but typically studied in purebred populations.
- Real-world breeding data often involves crossbred or admixed populations with unknown breed composition.
- Using such data without accounting for breed composition can bias marker effect estimates due to stratification and admixture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the accuracy of genomic selection using training data from crossbred and admixed livestock populations.
- To evaluate the impact of marker density and breed composition on the reliability of genomic prediction equations.
- To determine if purebreds can be selected for crossbred performance using GS without pedigree or breed information.
Main Methods:
- Simulated a genome with varying marker densities (5-40 markers/cM).
- Created pure breeds and subsequently F(1), F(2), 3-, and 4-way crosses, and admixed populations.
- Used the Bayes-B method for marker effect estimation and calculated prediction accuracy (correlation of true with estimated breeding value) using a purebred validation set.
Main Results:
- Highest accuracy (0.79-0.85) was achieved when training data matched the purebred validation population.
- Crossbred and admixed training data yielded substantial accuracy (0.66-0.83), comparable to purebred training, especially with high-density markers.
- Accuracy decreased significantly if the target pure breed's genes were absent in the training population.
- Shorter haplotype segments in linkage disequilibrium were observed in crossbred/admixed populations.
Conclusions:
- High-density genomic selection is feasible and accurate using crossbred and admixed training data for all contributing pure breeds.
- Breed composition does not need explicit accounting for accurate GS prediction equations in mixed populations.
- Purebreds can be selected for crossbred performance using GS without pedigree or breed information, leveraging high-density markers.
- Shorter linkage disequilibrium segments in admixed populations offer potential for quantitative trait loci (QTL) fine mapping.
More Related Videos
06:18Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
Published on: July 11, 2025
10:08Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
Published on: August 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Hybrid Zones
Monohybrid Crosses
Monohybrid Crosses
What is Population Genetics?
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...