Is bacteriologic surveillance in endoscope reprocessing stringent enough?

J Kovaleva1, N E L Meessen, F T M Peters

  • 1Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. j.kovaleva@mmb.umcg.nl

Endoscopy
|September 15, 2009
PubMed

Insights

A contaminated duodenoscope caused multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in three patients. Routine endoscope culturing identified the scope as the infection source, preventing further spread.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Device Contamination
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Endoscopes, particularly duodenoscopes, are linked to nosocomial infections.
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) procedures carry a risk of infection transmission.

Observation:

  • An outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis occurred in three patients post-ERCP.
  • Molecular typing identified a single ERCP scope as the source of P. aeruginosa transmission.

Findings:

  • No contamination was found in washer-disinfectors, tubing, or environmental surfaces.
  • Pseudomonas isolates from patient blood and the endoscope channels before ethylene oxide (ETO) sterilization were molecularly linked.
  • Routine microbiological surveillance of endoscopes successfully detected the contaminated device.

Implications:

  • Despite not preventing initial infections, endoscope culturing aids in identifying contamination sources.
  • This surveillance protocol likely prevented additional cross-contaminations in subsequent ERCP procedures.
  • Enhanced disinfection and surveillance protocols are crucial for medical device safety.