Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction treated with atenolol
John R Kapoor1, Paul A Heidenreich
1Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. jkapoor@stanford.edu
Insights
Atenolol and carvedilol showed lower unadjusted mortality in heart failure patients compared to metoprolol tartrate. After adjustments, atenolol demonstrated a comparable and potentially lower risk of death, suggesting its utility in heart failure treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol are approved for heart failure treatment.
- Metoprolol tartrate is considered inferior, and atenolol has not been extensively studied in this context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare all-cause mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction treated with atenolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol tartrate.
- To evaluate the potential utility of atenolol in heart failure management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 974 patients with left ventricular function ≤40%.
- Comparison of unadjusted and propensity-adjusted all-cause mortality rates at 6 months across treatment groups (atenolol, carvedilol, metoprolol tartrate).
Main Results:
- Unadjusted 6-month mortality was lower for atenolol (3.2%) and carvedilol (4.2%) versus metoprolol tartrate (7.5%).
- After propensity adjustment, atenolol treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of death compared to metoprolol tartrate.
- Outcomes for atenolol were comparable to those treated with carvedilol.
Conclusions:
- Atenolol may be a viable treatment option for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
- Further randomized trials are needed to directly compare atenolol with established beta-blockers like carvedilol in heart failure.
Abstract:
Metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol are approved for use in heart failure. Other beta-blockers have been found to be inferior (metoprolol tartrate) or have not been studied (atenolol). The authors compared all-cause mortality following treatment with either atenolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol tartrate for 974 patients with left ventricular function < or =40%. The unadjusted mortality at 6 months was lower with atenolol (3.2%) and carvedilol (4.2%) when compared with metoprolol tartrate (7.5%, P< or =.039). However, patients with atenolol were older but had less prior heart failure. After adjustment for the propensity to be treated with atenolol, patients actually treated with atenolol had a significantly lower risk of death compared with treatment with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcome to those treated with carvedilol. These results suggest that atenolol may be useful for patients with heart failure treatment and highlight the need for a randomized trial comparing atenolol with established beta-blockers.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy