Related Experiment Videos
Heart failure in ALLHAT: did blood pressure medication at study entry influence outcome?
Richard H Grimm1, Barry R Davis, Linda B Piller
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Insights
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) found lower heart failure (HF) rates with chlorthalidone. This study found no significant evidence that prior antihypertensive drug use explained these HF differences.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) unexpectedly showed lower heart failure (HF) rates in patients taking chlorthalidone compared to amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin.
- Early HF differences in ALLHAT raised questions about the potential impact of antihypertensive medications used before enrollment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether pre-enrollment antihypertensive drug use influenced the observed differences in hospitalized heart failure (HF) events between treatment groups in the ALLHAT study.
Main Methods:
- A post hoc analysis of hospitalized HF events from the ALLHAT trial was conducted.
- Pre-enrollment antihypertensive medication data was collected for a subset of patients (63%).
- A case-only analysis examined the interaction between previous medication classes and ALLHAT treatment on HF outcomes using interaction odds ratios (ORs).
Main Results:
- Among patients with HF, a significant proportion had prior use of diuretics (39%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (37%), beta-blockers (17%), and calcium channel blockers (47%).
- Interaction ORs for year 1 HF comparing amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin to chlorthalidone, stratified by pre-entry diuretic use, were not statistically significant (e.g., amlodipine vs. chlorthalidone: 1.08, P=.83).
- Similar non-significant results were observed when controlling for other pre-entry antihypertensive classes.
Conclusions:
- There was no significant evidence found to suggest that the type of antihypertensive medication used prior to the ALLHAT trial explained the observed differences in hospitalized heart failure rates between the treatment groups.
Abstract:
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009;11:466-474. (c)2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Lower heart failure (HF) rates in individuals taking chlorthalidone vs amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin were unanticipated in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). HF differences appeared early, leading to questions about the possible influence of pre-enrollment antihypertensive drugs. A post hoc study evaluated hospitalized HF events. During year 1479 individuals had HF, with pre-entry antihypertensive medication data obtained on 301 patients (63%). Case-only analysis examined interactive effects (interaction odds ratio [OR, ratio of ORs]) of previous medication and ALLHAT treatment on HF outcomes, eg, did treatment effect differ by pre-entry antihypertensive class? Among cases, 39%, 37%, 17%, and 47% were taking pre-entry diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers, respectively. Interaction OR for year 1 HF for amlodipine vs chlorthalidone for patients taking vs not taking diuretics pre-entry was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-2.21; P=.83); for lisinopril vs chlorthalidone, 1.33 (95% CI, 0.65-2.74; P=.44); and for doxazosin vs chlorthalidone, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.57-2.25; P=.73). Controlling for other pre-entry antihypertensives yielded similar results. There was no significant evidence that pre-entry drug type explained observed hospitalized HF differences by ALLHAT treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology