Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
Susan Jennifer Thomas1, Craig Joseph Gonsalvez, Stuart John Johnstone
1Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia. sthomas@uow.edu.au
This study reveals that both attention facilitation and inhibition influence performance in the Go/NoGo task. Sequence effects are crucial, as overlooking them can confound facilitation and inhibition findings.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychology
Background:
- Attention involves asymmetric facilitatory and inhibitory processes impacting response times, accuracy, and neural activity.
- Stimulus context, particularly repetitions, often leads to facilitation, yet facilitation in the Go/NoGo task remains understudied compared to inhibition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct roles and interplay of facilitation and inhibition within an adapted Go/NoGo task.
- To examine how stimulus sequencing affects behavioral and neuroelectric measures of attention.
Main Methods:
- Twenty healthy adults completed a modified Go/NoGo task with manipulated facilitation and inhibition levels.
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral data were analyzed based on preceding stimulus sequences.
- Established Go/NoGo effects on N2 and P3 components were replicated, alongside sequence-specific findings.
Main Results:
- Sequence effects significantly modulated behavioral and ERP measures, indicating distinct roles for facilitation and inhibition.
- Facilitation correlated with reduced P1 and N1 latencies for Go stimulus repetitions.
- Increased inhibitory load led to prolonged N1, P2, and N2 latencies, suggesting their involvement in inhibition.
Conclusions:
- Both facilitatory and inhibitory processes are integral to Go/NoGo task performance.
- Sequence effects are critical and can confound facilitation and inhibition if not accounted for.
- Specific ERP components (P1, N1, N2, P3) show distinct temporal dynamics related to facilitation and inhibition, with P3 latency linked to response execution.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Social Facilitation
Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Neurotransmitters
Combined Effects of Drugs: Antagonism
The most common type is receptor antagonism, where one drug acts as an antagonist to block the effects of another drug by...
Enzyme Inhibition
Long-term Potentiation
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when presynaptic neurons...

