Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator discharge continues to be a major problem in clinical practice
Łukasz Jodko1, Zdzisława Kornacewicz-Jach, Jarosław Kaźmierczak
1Department of Cardiology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland. lukaszjodko@wp.pl
Insights
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges remain a problem, often caused by misidentifying supraventricular arrhythmias. New ICDs have not eliminated this issue, highlighting the need for better rhythm discrimination.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing ventricular arrhythmias.
- Inappropriate detection and therapy delivery by ICDs remain a significant clinical concern.
- Distinguishing between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias is challenging for ICDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence and causes of inappropriate rhythm detection by ICDs.
- To compare the effectiveness of single-chamber versus dual-chamber ICDs in detecting ventricular arrhythmias accurately.
- To identify factors contributing to inappropriate ICD therapies.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of 190 patients with ICDs.
- Analysis of 2244 arrhythmia events, including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.
- Comparison of inappropriate therapy rates between single-chamber and dual-chamber ICD systems.
Main Results:
- 19.2% of ventricular origin events led to inappropriate ICD discharge.
- Atrial fibrillation/flutter (42.23%) and sinus tachycardia (12.1%) were common causes of inappropriate therapies.
- No significant difference in inappropriate therapy rates for rapid supraventricular rhythms between single-chamber and dual-chamber ICDs was observed.
- Single-chamber ICDs showed higher rates of inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia compared to dual-chamber ICDs.
Conclusions:
- The problem of inappropriate ICD discharge persists despite advancements in device technology.
- Accurate differentiation between supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains a critical challenge for ICDs.
- Further improvements in ICD algorithms are needed to minimize inappropriate therapies.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and causes of inappropriate rhythm detection, and to compare adequacy of ventricular arrhythmia detection by single-chamber and dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).
Methods:
We evaluated 190 patients (age 57.2 +/- 11.2 years) with ICD.
Follow-Up:
34.3 +/- +/- 22 months. Dual-chamber ICD was used in 54 patients.
Results:
We evaluated 2244 arrhythmia events recognized as of ventricular origin, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. 431 events (19.2%) were recognized erroneously and resulted in an inappropriate ICD discharge. Most cases of inappropriate therapies (182 events, 42.23%) were due to atrial fibrillation or flutter. Overall, inappropriate arrhythmia detection was found in 64 (33.6%) of 190 patients. In terms of the number of affected patients, the most common cause of inappropriate ICD discharge was sinus tachycardia - 23 (12.1%) patients, followed by atrial fibrillation - 16 (8.4%) patients. Among 54 patients with dual-chamber ICD, inappropriate therapy was noted in 21 (38.8%) patients, (T wave oversensing, sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation etc.). No significant difference was seen in the rate of inappropriate therapy due to a rapid supraventricular rhythm between patients with single-chamber versus dual-chamber ICD. In contrast, patients with single-chamber ICD more often experienced inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation (155 vs. 28 patients) and sinus tachycardia (66 vs. 9 patients).
Conclusions:
Despite of introduction of new generations of ICDs, the problem of inappropriate ICD discharge could not be eliminated. The major problem is distinction between supraventricular arrhythmia and ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
