Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Instrument Calibration

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

GcDUO: an open-source software for GC × GC-MS data analysis.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025

Same author

Modeling the effects of prebiotic interventions on luminal and mucosa-associated gut microbiota without and with <i>Clostridium difficile</i> challenge <i>in vitro</i>.

Frontiers in nutrition·2024

Same author

Potential of Mesalazine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Measuring Fecal Excretion in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2023

Same author

Lipidome Analysis in Brain and Peripheral Plasma Following Milk Fat Globule Membrane Supplementation in Rodents.

Molecular nutrition & food research·2022

Same author

Characterization of Clinical Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion and Pharmacokinetics of Velsecorat Using an Intravenous Microtracer Combined with an Inhaled Dose in Healthy Subjects.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals·2021

Same author

Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Fish Oil and Fenofibrate on Plasma Metabolomic Profiles in Overweight and Obese Individuals.

Molecular nutrition & food research·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

Analytical error reduction using single point calibration for accurate and precise metabolomic phenotyping.

Frans M van der Kloet¹, Ivana Bobeldijk, Elwin R Verheij

¹TNO Quality of Life, P.O. Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.

Journal of Proteome Research

|September 17, 2009

Summary

This study introduces a new workflow to reduce analytical errors in large-scale metabolomics. By using pooled calibration samples and multiple internal standards, data quality is significantly improved for mass spectrometry-based methods.

More Related Videos

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics

Published on: November 29, 2024

A Tandem Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Metabolite Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus

A Tandem Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Metabolite Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus

Published on: March 28, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics

Published on: November 29, 2024

A Tandem Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Metabolite Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus

A Tandem Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Metabolite Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus

Published on: March 28, 2017

Area of Science:

Analytical Chemistry
Metabolomics
Biotechnology

Background:

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics studies face challenges controlling analytical data quality due to instrumental drift and suboptimal platform performance.
Lack of suitable labeled internal standards and calibration standards complicates error management in large-scale metabolomics.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a workflow for significantly reducing analytical errors in metabolomics.
To enhance the reliability of data generated from mass spectrometry-based metabolomics platforms.

Main Methods:

Implementation of a workflow utilizing pooled calibration samples.
Application of a multiple internal standard strategy.
Utilizing between- and within-batch calibration techniques.

Main Results:

Significant reduction in analytical error observed.
A 25% increase in metabolite peaks with a Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) below 20% was achieved.
The workflow did not interfere with subsequent statistical analysis of the data.

Conclusions:

The proposed workflow effectively minimizes analytical errors in metabolomics studies.
This approach improves data quality and reliability for MS-based metabolomics.
The method ensures that data remains suitable for robust statistical analysis.