Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experiences of Australians Living With Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Mask contrast and size do not alter suppression depth in the tracking continuous flash suppression paradigm.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Breakthrough thresholds in continuous flash suppression are tuned to mask temporal frequency but suppression depth is constant.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Perception of audio-visual synchrony is modulated by walking speed and step-cycle phase.

Perception·2025
Same author

Sensory reliability takes priority over the central tendency effect in temporal and spatial estimation.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Motion streaks in fast motion rivalry cause orientation-selective suppression.

Deborah Apthorp1, Peter Wenderoth, David Alais

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. deboraha@psych.usyd.edu.au

Journal of Vision
|September 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Fast motion creates visual "streaks," enhancing rivalry suppression for parallel probes. This orientation-dependent suppression in binocular rivalry supports the motion streaks hypothesis for fast-moving objects.

More Related Videos

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Motion processing

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry occurs when dissimilar images are presented to each eye.
  • Temporal integration may cause fast-moving objects to leave oriented "motion streaks."

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if "motion streaks" influence binocular rivalry suppression.
  • To compare rivalry suppression between fast and slow motions using static probes.

Main Methods:

  • Studied binocular rivalry with orthogonally translating Gaussian blobs.
  • Measured suppression strength using static oriented probes (parallel and orthogonal to motion).
  • Quantified suppression depth via monocular probe thresholds during dominance and suppression.

Main Results:

  • Suppression depth depended on probe orientation for fast motion, but not slow motion.
  • Orientation-tuned threshold elevations were observed during both suppression and dominance.
  • Fast motion rivalry showed greater suppression for probes parallel to motion direction.

Conclusions:

  • Orientation-dependent suppression in fast motion rivalry supports the "motion streaks" hypothesis.
  • Within-channel masking likely contributes to the observed suppression effects.
  • Visual system integrates motion information, influencing rivalry dynamics.