Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
05:02
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Exploitation and double standards in research in developed countries.
1Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University.
Monash Bioethics Review
|September 19, 2009
Summary
Research participants globally deserve fair benefit-sharing. This study argues that the moral obligation to share research profits extends to participants within developed nations, not just developing ones.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Medical Research Ethics
- Global Health Equity
Background:
- International research collaborations often involve benefit-sharing agreements with participants from developing countries.
- A common ethical assumption is that research participants in developed countries do not require similar benefit-sharing due to presumed solidarity.
- This disparity raises questions about equitable treatment in research across different socioeconomic contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the ethical justification for differential benefit-sharing in research based on participant nationality.
- To argue for the extension of benefit-sharing obligations to research participants within developed countries.
- To challenge assumptions about solidarity and altruism that underpin current ethical practices.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of benefit-sharing principles in biomedical research.
- Comparative examination of research participant treatment in developed versus developing countries.
- Deconstruction of ethical assumptions regarding national solidarity and altruism in research contexts.
Main Results:
- The moral obligation for benefit-sharing in research is not inherently limited to international collaborations involving developing countries.
- Denying benefit-sharing to participants in developed countries relies on questionable assumptions about internal solidarity and altruism.
- Such practices can lead to exploitative conditions for research participants within developed nations, mirroring potential exploitation in developing nations.
Conclusions:
- Ethical frameworks should ensure equitable benefit-sharing for all research participants, regardless of their nationality or the country where research is conducted.
- A consistent ethical standard is necessary to prevent exploitation and uphold the rights of research participants globally.
- Rethinking assumptions about solidarity is crucial for advancing global research ethics and ensuring fair treatment.
Related Concept Videos
01:56Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
02:07Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
02:30Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...