Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

06:16
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Defining research
1Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University.
Monash Bioethics Review
|September 19, 2009
Summary
Defining research activities for regulatory oversight is challenging. This article explores research characteristics to determine which activities require regulatory review and discussion.
Area of Science:
- Ethics
- Regulatory Science
- Legal Frameworks
Background:
- Defining research for regulatory, ethical, and legal purposes presents significant challenges.
- Clear definitions are crucial for appropriate oversight and compliance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore and emphasize aspects of research that qualify it as a reviewable activity.
- To stimulate discussion on identifying research activities necessitating a regulatory response.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and conceptual analysis of research definitions.
- Exploration of characteristics that define research activities.
Main Results:
- Research activities attract specific regulatory, ethical, and legal responses.
- A universally clear definition of research remains elusive.
Conclusions:
- Identifying reviewable research activities is complex but essential for regulatory frameworks.
- Further discussion is needed to delineate activities requiring regulatory scrutiny.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Archival Research
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Defining Psychology
Psychology is the scientific discipline dedicated to understanding both observable behavior and the internal mental processes underlying such behavior. It aims to comprehend human nature and apply this understanding to solve practical problems, enhance well-being, and improve societal outcomes. An example of psychology's application is the study of prosocial behavior, such as why and under what conditions individuals might help strangers in need. This process involves describing observed...

