Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Functional Reconstitution and Channel Activity Measurements of Purified Wildtype and Mutant CFTR Protein
Published on: March 9, 2015
Correctors enhance maturation of DeltaF508 CFTR by promoting interactions between the two halves of the molecule
Tip W Loo1, M Claire Bartlett, David M Clarke
1Department of Medicine and Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Abstract:
Deletion of Phe508 in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (DeltaF508 CFTR) causes cystic fibrosis. CFTR consists of two homologous halves with each containing a nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) and a transmembrane domain (TMD). DeltaF508 CFTR appears to be trapped in an incompletely folded state. Small molecules (correctors) promote folding of DeltaF508 CFTR with relatively low efficiency. Understanding the mechanism of repair may lead to the development of more effective correctors. Here we tested the effect of correctors and the DeltaF508 mutation on interactions between the halves of CFTR when expressed as separate polypeptides. Glycosylation of C-half CFTR was defective when expressed alone as a mixture of core and unglycosylated proteins was detected. Coexpression of C-half CFTR with either wild-type N-half or DeltaF508/N-half CFTR, however, increased the amount of core-glycosylated protein, but only coexpression with wild-type N-half promoted maturation of C-half CFTR (Endo H resistant). This suggested that the DeltaF508 mutation inhibited some interactions between N-half and C-half CFTRs. Interaction of A52-tagged wild-type N-half or DeltaF508/N-half CFTR with histidine-tagged C-half CFTR was then followed by nickel-chelate chromatography. Coexpression of A52-tagged wild-type N-half or DeltaF508/N-half CFTR with histidine-tagged C-half CFTR resulted in the wild-type N-half CFTR but not DeltaF508/N-half CFTR protein being retained on the column. Coexpression of DeltaF508/N-half and C-half CFTR in the presence correctors VX-325 and corr-4a, however, restored interactions between the two halves. An interaction that was restored was that between NBD1 and TMD2 as the correctors restored cross-linking of mutant DeltaF508/NBD1(V510C)/TMD2(A1067C). Therefore, correctors promote proper interactions between the two halves of CFTR.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic sinusitis...
Bacterial Protein Maturation
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation, but...
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Improving Translational Accuracy
Protein Modifications in the RER
Broadly, these modifications can be categorized into four main categories — glycosylation, formation of disulfide bonds, assembly of protein subunits, and specific proteolytic cleavages like removal of signal sequences.

