Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Diagnosing delayed cerebral ischemia with different CT modalities in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with
Jan Willem Dankbaar1, Nicolien K de Rooij, Birgitta K Velthuis
1Department of Radiology, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.w.dankbaar@umcutrecht.nl
Insights
CT perfusion (CTP) is superior for diagnosing delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage. This imaging technique aids in timely decision-making for patients experiencing clinical deterioration.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Neurocritical Care
- Cerebrovascular Diseases
Background:
- Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), significantly impacting patient prognosis.
- Early and accurate diagnosis of DCI is challenging, necessitating advanced imaging techniques for timely intervention.
- Noncontrast CT (NCT), CT perfusion (CTP), and CT angiography (CTA) are evaluated for their diagnostic utility in suspected DCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the diagnostic performance of NCT, CTP, and CTA in identifying DCI.
- To compare the effectiveness of these imaging modalities in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage experiencing clinical deterioration.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study enrolled 42 patients with aSAH and clinical deterioration suggestive of DCI.
- Patients underwent NCT, CTP, and CTA scans upon admission and after clinical deterioration.
- Diagnostic values (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated, with clinical diagnosis by neurologists serving as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- CTP demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.79) for DCI compared to NCT and CTA.
- CTP also showed superior positive predictive value (0.88) and negative predictive value (0.73).
- NCT and CTA had lower diagnostic accuracy, with CTA showing limited specificity (0.50).
Conclusions:
- Qualitative assessment of CT perfusion (CTP) is diagnostically superior to NCT and CTA for DCI.
- CTP can be a valuable tool for rapid decision-making and guiding treatment strategies in DCI patients.
- These findings support the integration of CTP in the diagnostic workup of DCI following subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Background And Purpose:
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage worsens the prognosis and is difficult to diagnose. We investigated the diagnostic value of noncontrast CT (NCT), CT perfusion (CTP), and CT angiography (CTA) for DCI after clinical deterioration in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Methods:
We prospectively enrolled 42 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with clinical deterioration suspect for DCI (new focal deficit or Glasgow Coma Scale decrease >or=2 points) within 21 days after hemorrhage. All patients underwent NCT, CTP, and CTA scans on admission and directly after clinical deterioration. The gold standard was the clinical diagnosis DCI made retrospectively by 2 neurologists who interpreted all clinical data, except CTP and CTA, to rule out other causes for the deterioration. Radiologists interpreted NCT and CTP images for signs of ischemia (NCT) or hypoperfusion (CTP) not localized in the neurosurgical trajectory or around intracerebral hematomas, and CTA images for presence of vasospasm. Diagnostic values for DCI of NCT, CTP, and CTA were assessed by calculating sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values with 95% CIs.
Results:
In 3 patients with clinical deterioration, imaging failed due to motion artifacts. Of the remaining 39 patients, 25 had DCI and 14 did not. NCT had a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73), specificity=0.71 (0.57 to 0.77), positive predictive value=0.78 (0.55 to 0.91), negative predictive value=0.48 (0.28 to 0.68); CTP: sensitivity=0.84 (0.65 to 0.94), specificity=0.79 (0.52 to 0.92), positive predictive value=0.88 (0.69 to 0.96), negative predictive value=0.73 (0.48 to 0.89); CTA: sensitivity=0.64 (0.45 to 0.80), specificity=0.50 (0.27 to 0.73), positive predictive value=0.70 (0.49 to 0.84), negative predictive value=0.44 (0.23 to 0.67).
Conclusions:
As a diagnostic tool for DCI, qualitative assessment of CTP is overall superior to NCT and CTA and could be useful for fast decision-making and guiding treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology

