Distance alone does not define the value of the posterior mediastinal route for esophageal reconstruction

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

David T Cooke, Royce F Calhoun

    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    |September 22, 2009
    PubMed
    Abstract

    No abstract available in PubMed .

    More Related Videos

    Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy09:04

    Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    Related Concept Videos

    Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

    Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

    Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
    Clinical Manifestations: