Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
A Laser Capture Microdissection Protocol That Yields High Quality RNA from Fresh-frozen Mouse Bones
Published on: September 16, 2019
Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes
Stephan W Tohtz1, Michael Müller, Lars Morawietz
1Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. stephan.tohtz@charite.de
Unlabelled:
Clinical findings and blood parameters often are inconclusive in patients with periprosthetic joint infections. Among the accepted criteria for diagnosis, histologic analysis of debrided tissue can detect infection in most cases but does not allow intraoperative decision making. We evaluated the validity of intraoperative frozen sections for detection of prosthetic infections. The results from frozen and permanent sections of periprosthetic membranes of 64 consecutive patients who underwent exchange procedures after hip arthroplasty were compared using the histopathologic consensus classification of Morawietz et al. Blood parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein) and culture results of preoperatively aspirated joint fluid and intraoperative tissue samples were correlated with the histologic results. In 50 patients (78.1%), agreement was found between the frozen and permanent sections. Two patients (3.1%) revealed a discrepancy between the two histologic methods. In 12 patients (18.8%), a diagnosis was not possible based on the frozen sections because the tissue samples were not representative enough for definite classification. For the analyzable cases (n = 52), the sensitivity of frozen-section histologic analysis was 86.6%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 96.2%. Our data support a recommendation for use of intraoperative frozen sections for diagnosis of septic versus aseptic loosening in revision hip surgery.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Insights
Intraoperative frozen sections accurately detect periprosthetic joint infections during revision hip surgery. This method offers high sensitivity and specificity, aiding in timely diagnosis and treatment decisions for septic versus aseptic loosening.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Pathology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose diagnostic challenges.
- Clinical and blood parameters are often inconclusive for PJI diagnosis.
- Histologic analysis is reliable but not suitable for intraoperative decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic validity of intraoperative frozen sections for detecting prosthetic joint infections.
- To compare frozen section results with permanent sections and other diagnostic markers.
Main Methods:
- A comparative diagnostic study involving 64 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
- Frozen sections of periprosthetic membranes were analyzed and compared to permanent sections.
- Correlation with blood parameters (ESR, leukocyte count, CRP) and joint fluid/tissue cultures.
Main Results:
- High agreement (78.1%) between frozen and permanent sections.
- For analyzable cases (n=52), frozen sections demonstrated 86.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.2% accuracy.
- Frozen sections provided a reliable intraoperative diagnosis in most cases.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative frozen sections are a valid and accurate tool for diagnosing PJI during revision hip surgery.
- This technique supports intraoperative decision-making for septic versus aseptic loosening.
- Frozen section analysis can improve patient management for suspected periprosthetic joint infections.