Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Published on: May 5, 2023
Reintervention after mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Marcia Clark1, David G Campbell, Greg Kiss
1Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, St Adelaide, 270 Wakefield Street, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Background:
Medial compartment osteoarthritis is a common disorder that often is treated by unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Although the Oxford 3 prosthesis is commonly used based on revision rate and cumulative survival, our experience suggests that although there may be adequate implant survival rates, we observed a worrisome and undisclosed reintervention rate of nonrevision procedures.
Purpose:
We describe the frequency and cause of repeat intervention subsequent to implanting this device.
Methods:
Between 1998 and 2005, 398 patients underwent UKA using the Oxford 3 prosthesis. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 43 months; range, 12-102 months).
Results:
Forty of the 398 (10%) patients had 55 (13.8%) repeat anesthetics (reintervention). There were 38 nonrevision reinterventions. Revision was performed in 15 patients (3.8%), but two patients had a second revision (17 revisions or 4.3%). We revised the UKA to a second UKA in seven of the 15 cases but two subsequently were rerevised to a TKA; eight were revised directly to a TKA.
Conclusions:
Although our data confirm the reported revision rates for this prosthesis, we observed a substantial reintervention rate. Most of the reinterventions are minor and are diagnosed frequently and treated arthroscopically. If revision is required, a second UKA may be considered and performed successfully in patients with isolated loosening of one component.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.