Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Propensity vectors of low-ASA residue pairs in the distinction of protein interactions
1Bioinformatics Research Center & School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798.
Abstract:
We introduce low-ASA residue pairs as classification features for distinguishing the different types of protein interactions. A low-ASA residue pair is defined as two contact residues each from one chain that have a small solvent accessible surface area (ASA). This notion of residue pairs is novel as it first combines residue pairs with the O-ring theory, an influential proposition stating that the binding hot spots at the interface are often surrounded by a ring of energetically less important residues. As binding hot spots lie in the core of the stability for protein interactions, we believe that low-ASA residue pairs can sharpen the distinction of protein interactions. The main part of our feature vector is 210-dimensional, consisting of all possible low-ASA residue pairs; the value of every feature is determined by a propensity measure. Our classification method is called OringPV, which uses propensity vectors of protein interactions for support vector machine. OringPV is tested on three benchmark datasets for a variety of classification tasks such as the distinction between crystal packing and biological interactions, the distinction between two different types of biological interactions, etc. The evaluation frameworks include within-dataset, cross-dataset comparison, and leave-one-out cross-validation. The results show that low-ASA residue pairs and the propensity vector description of protein interactions are truly strong in the distinction. In particular, many cross-dataset generalization capability tests have achieved excellent recalls and overall accuracies, much outperforming existing benchmark methods.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Amino acids
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...