Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
10:23
Measuring In Vivo Changes in Extracellular Neurotransmitters During Naturally Rewarding Behaviors in Female Syrian Hamsters
Published on: September 12, 2017
Do anvil-using banded mongooses understand means-end relationships? A field experiment
1Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK. C.A.Muller@exeter.ac.uk
Animal Cognition
|September 23, 2009
Summary
Wild banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) do not exhibit means-end comprehension for tool selection. Their choice of anvils for opening food is learned through trial and error, not specialized cognitive abilities.
Area of Science:
- Animal cognition
- Behavioral ecology
- Evolutionary psychology
Background:
- Tool use is hypothesized to drive cognitive evolution, particularly means-end comprehension.
- Studies on primates and birds show some causal understanding, but testing is needed in small-brained species and natural settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate means-end comprehension in wild banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), a small-brained tool-using carnivore.
- To assess if the need for object selection in tool use selects for specialized cognitive abilities in natural environments.
Main Methods:
- A transfer test using novel anvil objects was presented to wild banded mongooses.
- The study focused on their ability to choose appropriate anvils for opening hard-shelled food items.
Main Results:
- No evidence of means-end comprehension or heuristic strategies in anvil choice was found.
- Anvil recognition appears to be learned through trial and error for different anvil types.
Conclusions:
- The need to choose suitable objects for tool use has not selected for specialized cognitive abilities in banded mongooses.
- This suggests simpler cognitive strategies may suffice for tool use in natural environments, challenging captive study findings.
Related Concept Videos
00:58Symbiosis
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
01:23McNemar's Test
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
02:30Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...