Australian professional practice bodies and the tort of negligent investigation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Mass-Rearing and Molecular Studies in Tortricidae Pest Insects
Published on: March 25, 2022
1Globalisation and Health Project, College of Law, The Australian National University.
Abstract:
The New South Wales Supreme Court has examined the statutory and common law duties of the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission and the New South Wales Medical Board in the recent case of Attorney General (NSW) v Bar-Mordecai [2008] NSWSC 774. The judgment establishes that a professional practice body investigating the alleged misconduct of a doctor will rarely be liable under Australian statutory or common law duties to compensate that doctor for harm arising as a result of negligent investigatory practices. In particular, it establishes that such a body owes no duty to take reasonable care to avoid psychiatric injury to a medical practitioner against whom a complaint has been lodged and whom it is investigating. It is argued that the differing approaches to the tort of negligent investigation in Canada and Australia stem from differences not only in policy values but in the legal frameworks used in each jurisdiction to determine the existence of duties of care at common law.
Related Concept Videos
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:

