Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

Four-dimensional targeting error analysis in image-guided radiotherapy.

M Riboldi1, G C Sharp, G Baroni

  • 1TBMLab, Department of Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano University, 20133 Milano, Italy. marco.riboldi@polimi.it

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|September 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Skull Base Chordoma: In Silico Analysis and In Vivo Application Towards Indirect Hypoxia Assessment.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2025
Same author

Development of a breathing lung phantom for proton CT imaging.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Comparative Analysis of Analog and Digital Chest Tube Drainage Systems Using a High-Fidelity 3D-Printed Neonatal Chest Model.

Pediatric pulmonology·2025
Same author

Validation of patient-specific deep learning markerless lung tumor tracking aided by 4DCBCT.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Virtual 4DCT generated from 4DMRI in gated particle therapy: phantom validation and application to lung cancer patients.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Maternal iron status in early pregnancy and DNA methylation in offspring: an epigenome-wide meta-analysis.

Clinical epigenetics·2022
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Quantifying 4D Targeting Error (4DTE) in image-guided radiotherapy (IGT) helps compare motion mitigation strategies for moving tumors. This 4DTE analysis improves tumor targeting accuracy by analyzing statistical fluctuations in tumor trajectory.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy
  • Biomedical Imaging

Background:

  • Image-guided therapy (IGT) enhances medical interventions through image acquisition and processing.
  • Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) significantly improves tumor targeting accuracy.
  • Tumor motion during IGRT introduces uncertainty, challenging image guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To objectively compare different motion mitigation strategies in IGRT.
  • To quantify residual uncertainties in tumor targeting for moving tumors.
  • To extend targeting error theory to a 4D space for accurate analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed 4D Targeting Error (4DTE) analysis, extending targeting error theory to a 4D space.
  • Represented 4DTE by a motion probability density function to describe tumor trajectory fluctuations.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

  • Applied 4DTE analysis to examples including 4DCT, respiratory gating, and real-time tumor tracking.

    • Main Results:

    • 4DTE analysis provides a quantitative method to assess residual uncertainties in tumor targeting.
    • The motion probability density function effectively describes statistical fluctuations of tumor trajectory.
    • Demonstrated the application of 4DTE in various motion mitigation scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • 4DTE analysis is crucial for objective comparison of motion mitigation strategies in IGRT.
    • Accurate quantification of tumor motion uncertainty enhances treatment planning and delivery.
    • This framework supports improved tumor targeting accuracy in image-guided radiotherapy for moving targets.