Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

The sensorimotor stage, the initial phase of Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, spans the first two years of a child's life. During this period, infants actively engage with their surroundings, building cognitive awareness through direct interaction with the world. This interaction is primarily based on sensory perception and motor actions, allowing infants to gradually understand basic physical properties and predict how objects interact within their environment.
Exploration...

The Nativist Approach

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...

Language Development

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...

Observational Learning

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Curriculum Learning with Infant Egocentric Videos.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026

Same author

Tracking the trajectory of executive function from 2.5 to 6.5 years of age and the impact of COVID-19.

Child development·2026

Same author

Rethinking the Origins of Cross-Language Effects: How Heard Verbs Influence Japanese- and English-Speaking Children's Attention to the Details of Actions.

Developmental science·2026

Same author

Second language vocabulary learning: The interplay between learning mode, testing mode and word class.

Cognition·2025

Same author

The world through infant eyes: Evidence for the early emergence of the cardinal orientation bias.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Leveraging technological advances to assess dyadic visual cognition during infancy in high- and low-resource settings.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Comment on "Infants' perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation".

John P Spencer¹, Evelina Dineva, Linda B Smith

¹Department of Psychology and Delta Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. john-spencer@uiowa.edu

Science (New York, N.Y.)

|September 26, 2009

Summary

Infants may search incorrectly for objects when experimenters provide social cues. Dynamic field theory simulations suggest weaker location encoding explains this infant behavior without needing natural pedagogy.

More Related Videos

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Development
Developmental Psychology
Computational Neuroscience

Background:

Perseverative search errors in infants, like the A-not-B error, are a key area in developmental psychology.
Topál et al. proposed that ostensive cues from experimenters explain these errors.
The theory of natural pedagogy suggests infants interpret ostensive cues as communicative acts.

Discussion:

This study tests the hypothesis that infants encode locations more weakly when social cues are present.
Dynamic Field Theory (DFT) provides a computational framework to model infant cognition.
Simulations explore how social cues might influence spatial representation and memory encoding.

Key Insights:

Quantitative simulations using Dynamic Field Theory demonstrate that weaker location encoding can account for infant perseverative search errors.
This DFT-based account successfully explains infant performance without invoking the theory of natural pedagogy.
The findings suggest a mechanism for how social cues might modulate spatial memory in infants.

Outlook:

Further research can explore the specific parameters within DFT that mediate the effect of social cues on spatial encoding.
Investigating developmental trajectories of sensitivity to ostensive cues in infancy is warranted.
Computational models can continue to refine our understanding of the interplay between social interaction and cognitive development in early childhood.