Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Systematic approach for the management of chronic kidney disease: moving beyond chronic kidney disease classification
Rafael Burgos-Calderon1, Santos Depine
1Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067. rburgosc@prtc.net
Insights
The classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires more than estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A new Systematic Approach for the Management of CKD (SAM-CKD) tool is introduced to standardize patient care.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Internal Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification has evolved significantly.
- Current diagnostic and prognostic criteria for CKD require refinement.
- Standardization of CKD management is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution of CKD classification criteria for diagnosis, prognosis, and population burden.
- To introduce a novel management approach, the Systematic Approach for the Management of CKD (SAM-CKD).
Main Methods:
- Literature review of CKD classification criteria.
- Development and introduction of the SAM-CKD framework.
Main Results:
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) alone is insufficient for CKD classification.
- Proteinuria combined with reduced eGFR strongly predicts CKD progression.
- Hypertension is an important, though not universally consistent, indicator of CKD progression.
- No studies have addressed the standardization of CKD management.
Conclusions:
- The study introduces SAM-CKD, a tool that integrates a broader classification model with systematic management.
- SAM-CKD aims to standardize CKD management and improve patient outcomes.
- This approach moves beyond mere classification to practical intervention in CKD care.
Purpose Of Review:
This review has two aims: to summarize the evolution of classification criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD) for diagnosis, prognosis and forecasting population burden of illness; to move the discussion beyond classification to intervention by introducing an approach we describe as the 'Systematic Approach for the Management of CKD' (SAM-CKD).
Recent Findings:
There is now ample evidence against the use of estimated GFR (eGFR) as the sole criterion for classifying CKD for the purpose of diagnosis, risk stratification and prediction of progression. There is ample evidence that significant proteinuria is a powerful predictor of progression but even more so when combined with reduced eGFR for individual and population risk projection. Hypertension also is an important indicator in CKD progression but not in all studies. Beyond classification, there are no studies addressing standardization of management of CKD to achieve the outcomes articulated by any of the practice guidelines.
Summary:
In this article we have moved the discussions of CKD beyond classification by introducing a clinical management tool, SAM-CKD, which couples a broader classification model with a systematic tool for management to foster standardization of CKD management for the future.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
