Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Protease inhibitor resistance in South African children with virologic failure
Gert U van Zyl1, Lize van der Merwe, Mathilda Claassen
1Centre for Infectious Diseases, Division of Medical Virology, Tygerberg and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. guvz@sun.ac.za
Insights
Ritonavir-single protease inhibitor (RTV-sPI) regimens in children carry a high risk of major protease inhibitor resistance mutations (MPIRM). Longer exposure and failure times on RTV-sPI significantly predict MPIRM development in pediatric HIV patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- HIV/AIDS research
- Pharmacogenetics
Background:
- First-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in South African children under 3 combines a protease inhibitor (PI) with two nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors.
- This study compared ritonavir (RTV) as a single PI (RTV-sPI) versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), which has a higher resistance barrier.
- The research focused on identifying antiretroviral resistance mutations in pediatric patients experiencing virologic failure on PI-based ART.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate antiretroviral resistance mutations in pediatric patients failing PI-based ART.
- To identify predictors of major PI resistance mutations (MPIRM) in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- A study was conducted on pediatric HIV patients at Tygerberg Academic Hospital who experienced virologic failure on a PI regimen.
- Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models were employed to analyze predictors of MPIRM.
Main Results:
- Major PI resistance mutations (MPIRM) were detected in 12 out of 17 patients who received RTV-sPI, compared to only 1 out of 13 patients on LPV/r.
- Exposure to RTV-sPI was significantly associated with MPIRM.
- Both the duration of exposure and the time to treatment failure while on RTV-sPI were significant positive predictors of MPIRM. CD4 count, viral load, age at first visit, and rifampin co-administration did not predict MPIRM.
Conclusions:
- The use of RTV-sPI in infants and children presents a substantial risk for developing MPIRM.
- The development of MPIRM is directly related to the duration of exposure and the time to virologic failure while on the RTV-sPI regimen.
Background:
In South Africa, first-line antiretroviral therapy for children younger than 3 years of age combines a protease inhibitor (PI) with 2 nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors. In our study, some pediatric patients received ritonavir (RTV) as single PI (RTV-sPI) and others ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), which has a higher resistance barrier. We explored antiretroviral resistance mutations in pediatric patients failing PI-based antiretroviral therapy and the predictors of major PI resistance mutations (MPIRM) in these patients.
Materials And Methods:
We studied pediatric HIV patients at Tygerberg Academic Hospital experiencing virologic failure on a PI regimen. Mixed-effects linear- and mixed-effect logistic regression modeling, were used to explore predictors of MPIRM.
Results:
MPIRM were found in 12 of 17 patients exposed to RTV-sPI compared with 1 of 13 patients treated with LPV/r. Exposure to RTV-sPI was significantly associated with MPIRM, with both exposure time and estimated failing time on RTV-sPI being significant positive predictors of MPIRM. Neither CD4 count, viral load, age at first visit nor receiving rifampin predicted MPIRM.
Conclusions:
RTV-sPI in infants and children poses a significant risk of MPIRM which is dependent on the exposure time and time failing while receiving the regimen.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibitors of Virion Maturation and Assembly
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

