Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Operative versus Nonoperative Management for Appendicitis.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

The Use of Prophylactic Insulin in Surgical Patients without Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Dietary modifications to prevent recurrent diverticulitis.

BMC research notes·2026
Same author

Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) trial: a protocol for a pragmatic randomised study of diverticulitis treatment in the USA.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Prescription Default Nudges for Opioid Reduction after Major Surgery (NORMS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

Dietary Carnosine Supplementation in Healthy Human Volunteers: A Safety, Tolerability, Plasma and Brain Concentration Study.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.

Peter McCulloch1, Douglas G Altman, W Bruce Campbell

  • 1Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. peter.mcculloch@nds.ox.ac.uk

Lancet (London, England)
|September 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Improving surgical assessment requires a structured approach, emphasizing prospective data collection and rigorous trial design. Recommendations focus on enhancing the evaluation of surgical interventions throughout their development lifecycle.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Surgical innovation and assessment
  • Medical research methodology
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Surgical interventions are complex, with assessment challenges arising from operator, team, and setting variability.
  • Factors like learning curves, quality variations, and equipoise perception complicate surgical evaluation.
  • Current assessment methods often fall short in capturing the nuances of surgical development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose recommendations for the robust assessment of surgical interventions.
  • To guide the development and evaluation of new surgical techniques.
  • To improve the overall quality and reliability of surgical research.

Main Methods:

  • A five-stage framework for surgical development assessment is proposed.
  • Emphasis on prospective databases, registries, and publicly registered protocols.
  • Advocacy for replacing case series with prospective development studies and research databases.
  • Integration of statistical process control techniques for ongoing assessment.
  • Prioritizing randomized trials with adequate pre-trial data and addressing associated challenges.

Main Results:

  • Recommendations for a structured, multi-stage approach to surgical assessment.
  • Increased utilization of prospective data collection and registration is encouraged.
  • Guidelines for the appropriate use of different study designs (e.g., prospective studies, randomized trials, interrupted time series).
  • Strategies to overcome challenges in randomized clinical trials for surgical research.

Conclusions:

  • A concerted effort from various stakeholders (editors, funders, regulators, societies) is needed for improved surgical research.
  • Implementing these recommendations can enhance the design, conduct, and reporting of surgical studies.
  • The proposed framework aims to ensure safer and more effective surgical interventions through better evaluation.