Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Efficacy of peritoneal ultrafiltration in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure
Jose E Sánchez1, Teresa Ortega, Carmen Rodríguez
1Nephrology Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. jesastur@hotmail.com
Insights
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers a promising treatment for refractory heart failure (HF), significantly improving patient functional status and quality of life. This fluid removal method reduces hospitalizations and mortality, proving to be a cost-effective alternative to conservative therapies.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a progressive, lethal disorder with significant mortality and hospitalization rates, often exacerbated by fluid accumulation.
- Refractory HF poses a challenge, necessitating advanced treatment strategies beyond standard drug regimens.
- Fluid management is critical in congestive HF, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating patients with congestive heart failure (HF) refractory to conventional treatment.
- To assess the impact of PD on patients' functional status, hospitalization rates, mortality, and health-related quality of life.
- To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing PD with conservative therapies for refractory HF.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted on patients with drug-refractory congestive HF.
- Patients were treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD), and outcomes were analyzed including functional status (NYHA), echocardiogram parameters, and biochemical markers.
- Health-related quality of life (EQ5D) and cost-utility were evaluated, comparing PD to conservative management.
Main Results:
- Peritoneal dialysis (PD) significantly improved NYHA functional status in all patients (P < 0.001) and reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P = 0.007).
- Hospitalization rates decreased dramatically (62 +/- 16 to 11 +/- 5 days/patient/year; P = 0.003), and life expectancy increased significantly.
- PD treatment led to a higher perceived state of health (0.6727 vs. 0.4305; P < 0.01) and was found to be cost-effective.
Conclusions:
- Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective treatment for refractory congestive heart failure (HF), improving functional status and quality of life.
- PD significantly reduces morbidity and mortality associated with refractory HF, offering better outcomes than conservative therapies.
- Congestive HF management programs should consider offering PD as a viable, cost-effective therapeutic option.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem in developed countries. HF is a progressive, lethal disorder, even with adequate treatment. There exists a vicious circle in the pathophysiology of HF that perpetuates and magnifies the problem. Concomitant fluid accumulation may worsen the congestive HF, it is responsible for numerous hospitalizations and it is an important cause of mortality. In this situation, any means of fluid removal may aid in the management of these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of refractory HF in terms of functional status, hospitalization and mortality. We also determined the improvement in health-related quality of life with the use of PD, and examined the economic consequences of its use.
Methods:
We conducted a single centre, prospective, non-randomized study involving patients showing symptoms and signs of congestive HF refractory to maximum tolerable drug treatment. All of them were treated with PD. We analysed physical and biochemical determinations, functional status (according to the NYHA classification) and echocardiogram parameters. Also, to determine the efficacy of the technique we compared the perceived state of health (measured by the EQ5D) to PD patients respect to those reported with conservative therapies. Finally, we carried out a cost-utility evaluation measured by the incremental cost-utility ratio between these two options.
Results:
Seventeen patients (65% men, 64 +/- 9 years) were included in the study, and 12 were still undergoing PD treatment at the end of the follow-up period (15 +/- 9 months). All patients improved their NYHA functional status (65% two classes; the rest, one; P < 0.001), with an important improvement in their pulmonary artery systolic pressure (44 +/- 12 versus 27 +/- 9 mmHg; P = 0.007), but no changes in left ventricular ejection fraction. Hospitalization rates underwent a dramatic reduction (from 62 +/- 16 to 11 +/- 5 days/patient/year; P = 0.003) before and after PD treatment. PD treatment raised life expectancy of 82% after 12 months of treatment, and 70% and 56% after 18 and 24 months, respectively, much better outcomes than those reported about conservative therapies, which only use diverse diuretic regimens. PD was associated with a higher perception state of health than the conservative therapy (0.6727 versus 0.4305; P < 0.01). Finally, we found that PD is cost-effective compared with the conservative therapy.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that congestive HF programmes should consider offering PD in hope of seeing better functional status, reduced morbidity and mortality, better quality of life as well as reduced health care costs.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy